Hi,

Actually, Semantic Forms already has querying functionality - the "Run
query" feature:

[1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms#Querying_data

Hauke - Were you aware of this? If so, how would what you're proposing be
different?

Sergey - He was talking about using the addition of querying as an excuse to
refactor SF to use POM - which is not a bad instinct in principle. :)

<http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms#Querying_data>-Yaron


On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Sergey Chernyshev <
sergey.chernys...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure if you can reuse SF form language as it seems to be targeted
> specifically at data entry.
> Also, did you check out Semantic DrillDown? It does some filtered
> navigation and allows for drop-downs and stuff.
>
> Not sure how POM is related to this... did you include wrong link?
>
>         Sergey
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Hauke Pribnow <hauke.prib...@gmx.net>wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody!
>>
>> While working on my Semantic Multi Edit Page I got the idea of also
>> creating another extension for Semantic MediaWiki which would allow
>> more-skilled users to create something like "search forms" for
>> less-skilled users who might not directly understand the semantic query
>> syntax.
>>
>> It would be great if the form design syntax for such an extension was
>> similar to the one of the already existing Semantic Forms extension; IMO
>> it would make even more sense to pretty much re-design the FormPrinter
>> from scratch and - during this process - turn it into a more general
>> code base for creating all sorts of forms, i.e. make the whole thing
>> more extendable.
>>
>> As already mentioned here
>> <http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms/POM>, the
>> current FormPrinter implementation acutally doesn't just print the form
>> (as the name suggests), but also does up to five other tasks like
>> parsing the page that should be edited, handling form input and actually
>> committing the change to a page that was modified through a form. To me,
>> this is way too much work for a class that - going by its name - should
>> only print out a neat form. Redesigning that class is/will be necessary
>> anyway.
>>
>> What do you think about these ideas?
>>
>>
>> Hauke Pribnow
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Return on Information:
>> Google Enterprise Search pays you back
>> Get the facts.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Semediawiki-devel mailing list
>> Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Return on Information:
> Google Enterprise Search pays you back
> Get the facts.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Reply via email to