Well, Semantic Forms' changing support for different versions of SMW is
already documented on its version history page:

http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms/Version_history

<http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Forms/Version_history>You
can do a search for "SMW". But I think the last few months have represented
a rare time (and hopefully it'll stay rare) when the latest SVN versions of
SF and SMW didn't work together (this time, due to some bug in SMW).

-Yaron

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Jack D. Pond <jack.p...@psitex.com> wrote:

> This is a great idea -  tagging known versions.
>
> For example, SF works with SMW(Version 1.5g-SVN,r60464).
>
> Would the best place be to document this on the individual extension pages,
> or should some type of matrix be developed?
>
> Since I test these things almost as soon as they are released in both the
> stable MW evironment (currently 1.15.1) and the HEAD, I'd be glad to help
> keep it up to date.
>
> So, would it be better to keep it on the Extension page or in a (preferably
> SF driven) matrix (and if so, where?)?
>
> Jack
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Markus Krötzsch [mailto:mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 1:23 PM
> > To: semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] vcard format not working
> >
> > On Freitag, 8. Januar 2010, Neill Mitchell wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I'm using MW 1.15.1, SMW 1.4.3 and SRF 1.4.6 fetched from SVN today.
> > > Before I got the svn copy the vcard component was crashing. Now it
> > > does not crash, but the resulting vcf file is empty. My query is:
> > >
> > > {{ #ask:
> > > [[Category:Person]]
> > >
> > > | ?Name=name
> > > | ?Company=organization
> > > | ?Position=note
> > > | ?Landline=workphone
> > > | ?Mobile=cellphone
> > > | ?Email=email
> > > | ?Website=homepage
> > > | ?Address=workstreet
> > > | ?Postcode=workpostalcode
> > > | format=vcard
> > >
> > > }}
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> >
> > I did not see any answers to this, so I sent one now: SRF in
> > SVN is compatible with SMW in SVN, but not with SMW 1.4.3.
> > Either you upgrade both to SVN or you work with the latest
> > stable releases of either tool. Maybe SRF could use some
> > improved documentation regarding its version requirements for
> > SMW (this could even be filed as a bug if it claims to work
> > with SMW 1.4.3 but doesn't).
> >
> > -- Markus
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Neill.
> > >
> > >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -----
> > > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer
> > Community
> > > Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A
> > > streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app
> > distribution fast and
> > > easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of
> > Verizon customers
> > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> > > Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Markus Krötzsch  <mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org>
> > * Personal page: http://korrekt.org
> > * Semantic MediaWiki: http://semantic-mediawiki.org
> > * Semantic Web textbook: http://semantic-web-book.org
> > --
> >
>
>


-- 
WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Reply via email to