On 07/02/2011 21:33, Samuel Lampa wrote: > On 02/07/2011 10:20 PM, Samuel Lampa wrote: >> I'm sure far from everything is perfectly thought out in RDFIO, but >> maybe it can be a useful starting point work for similar things like this. > > Thinking aloud now: .... Maybe, as much as there has recently been > discussions about merging efforts to provide a more generalized/ > integrated SPARQL/RDF store functionality [1], it might be a good time > to think also about a more generalized/integrated RDF/OWL import > functionality too?
I agree, and the former is really a prerequisite of the latter. Ideally, SMW could thus obtain access to external Linked Data (cached locally for query answering). Ways of dynamically locating and pulling such data have already been explored in the SMW-based ShortiPedia prototype (shortipedia.org). In any case (to answer Benedikt's initial email), the old vocabulary import functionality and the equivalent URI method both affect the RDF export only, and do not contribute to the data as viewed in SMW (e.g. via queries). This whole aspect of SMW needs to be rethought. Markus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Semediawiki-devel mailing list Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
