Hi Markus, Am 08.07.2011 20:20, schrieb Markus Krötzsch: > On 08/07/11 14:30, Stephan Gambke wrote: >> Hi James, >> >>> Semantic Glossary (Version 0.1 alpha) (r91693) + Lingo >> well, r91449 implemented some changes that I do not really like. >> Basically semantic objects not connected to a real wikipage are not >> supported anymore. <snip> > > I do not know about the detailed implementation of this extension, but > some clarification is needed here. The situation is actually the > opposite of what is written above: the recent changes are in fact > *introducing* the creation of non-page subobjects as a *new feature*.
> On the other hand, I do not think that it is viable to have internal > objects that belong to *no page at all*. This would imply that the data I was sure that internal objects survived data updating before so that was why I was not too happy discovering that the data was just gone after an update. I am not sure anymore though and I'm certainly not downgrading to prove one of us wrong. Anyway, thanks for the clarification. You are probably right that the glossary data should be stored on a wiki page somehow. This is already possible, you can just use the properties defined by the extension. It is just not advertised as the preferred method to build the glossary. I will probably change the focus and keep the internal objects mechanism as a simple alternative. Cheers, Stephan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Semediawiki-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
