> > Otherwise, I think I had to use Parser::parse() and I am not fully > > aware of the consequences really. Wouldn't even know which parameters I > > should supply. > > I'm not sure, but I think you should use recursiveTagParse here. Might > be worth asking about on wikitech.
Sure, normally you would use that instead of Parser::parse(), but if I can't use Parser::preprocessToDom() I also can't start ParserParser::recursiveTagParse(), both require a running Parser::parse() first. So I would only run the parser to use Parser::preprocessToDom() on my configuration value. Then I would use some hook where I can actually run Parser::preprocessToDom() Too much work and unstable for only making this work on the special page as it would look in inline mode. Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Semediawiki-devel mailing list Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
