Thank you; this gives me a means of illustrating my point.
Take the example of my name as given by Marcus:
Jon Lang{{#subobject name|personal=Jonathan|nickname=Jon|family=Lang}}
In order to set up a Semantic Glossary that uses Jon Lang as the term and
information from {{#subobject
name|personal=Jonathan|nickname=Jon|family=Lang}} to build a definition, you
would need a person to intervene, as there are no semantics connecting the
former to the latter: human intuition can make the connection, but a
machine lacks the necessary tagging to do so. Contrast this with:
{{#subobject name|personal=Jonathan|nickname=Jon|family=Lang|Jon Lang}}
In this case, it would be trivial for a machine to deduce that Jon
Langshould be the term associated with the definition that's built
from the
rest of the #subobject.
Stephan Gambke wrote:
> Sorry for interjecting and probably I did not really get your point
> here, but Semantic Glossary [1] has just been released in its first
> (hopefully) stable version and it does not care at all about how the
> data gets into the system as long as it is there. With your approach,
> what functionality could it have, that is not yet in?
>
> Cheers,
> Stephan
>
>
> [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Semantic_Glossary
>
>
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA® Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
