I haven't tried #show yet but I have tried #ask. It seems that the
parser functions cannot be called inside of {{{field}}} tag.
> So is that definitely  the case, or are you just guessing that you might 
> require this feature in
> the future?

Definitely-definitely. We need some kind of solution for this now,
whatever hackish it may be, and I can see that there will be more
projects where such feature is needed (especially the projects on
social roadmapping and strategic foresight).

-----
Yury Katkov



On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Yaron Koren <ya...@wikiworks.com> wrote:
> Ah, that's true, I didn't think about the "edit with form" case. Well, for
> that, you could use #show, assuming the value is being stored semantically -
> and you could have an #ifexists call to tie the whole thing together, so
> that #urlget is called for new pages, and #show is called for existing
> pages. It's a hack, but it wouldn't require any custom development.
>
> As for "parameters may not be defined from the beginning" - that's the
> central issue. New development would be required only if (a) they're not,
> and (b) there's more than one of them - since a single editable parameter
> can be handled by the "values dependent on" feature. So is that definitely
> the case, or are you just guessing that you might require this feature in
> the future?
>
> -Yaron
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Yury Katkov <katkov.ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I need the first one. There are some problems with this
>> UrlGetParameters approach: it seems that it will work for article
>> creation using the #formlink but it will not work for article edition
>> using 'Edit with Form' button. Another problem is that the parameters
>> for allowed value set restrictions may not be defined from the
>> beginning.
>>
>> Linking together pages inside the website section is typical example
>> of such feature. Am I right that the most frighting thing here is
>> making ask-queries in AJAX code?
>> -----
>> Yury Katkov
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Yaron Koren <ya...@wikiworks.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > No, the two examples are different - the "silly" one involves two
>> > "substitions", based on editable fields, while the "real" one involves
>> > one
>> > substitution, directly from the query string. Can you clarify the
>> > discrepancy? What is the form that you actually need?
>> >
>> > -Yaron
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Yury Katkov <katkov.ju...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Yaron!
>> >>
>> >> No, these two examples (the synthetic and silly flower example and the
>> >> real-world brainstorming example) are really the same.
>> >> What I need is to use the data that user put in the field1 as the
>> >> parameter of the query that defines the allowed values set in the
>> >> field2.
>> >>
>> >> Anyway, I'll try to clarify:
>> >> So the user edits the Flower Rose. He entered the Genus of Rose :
>> >> Rosa. He entered the color of Rose - for example Red. The field
>> >> 'related flowers' will be the listbox of all red flowers with genus
>> >> Rosa:
>> >>
>> >> {{field|related flowers|values from
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> query=[[Category:$1]][[Color::$2]][[Owner::+]]|substitute=Flowers[Genus],Flowers[Color]|input
>> >> type=listbox}}
>> >>
>> >> -----
>> >> Yury Katkov
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Yaron Koren <ya...@wikiworks.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Yury,
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't understand - are your data needs more complex than what you
>> >> > put
>> >> > in
>> >> > that sample form definition code earlier? If so, can you revise that
>> >> > sample
>> >> > code to more accurately reflect what you want your form to look like?
>> >> >
>> >> > -Yaron
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Yury Katkov <katkov.ju...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Yaron!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> There is no problem in passing the Session parameter I can use
>> >> >> either
>> >> >> 'query string' parameter of the formlink or the urlget function.
>> >> >> In this Trend form my main problem is to restrict the set of
>> >> >> possible
>> >> >> values which will be displayed in the "Related events" listboxes:
>> >> >> 1) All these values are pagenames for pages in Events category
>> >> >> 2) All these pages belongs to the same Session as the Trend, that
>> >> >> I'm
>> >> >> currently looking at
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The same is for related Technologies: I want to link objects only
>> >> >> inside the session, so that the participants of the session "The
>> >> >> Future of Food" don't try to link there Trends and possible events
>> >> >> with objects from the Session "The future of titan manufacturing ".
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The two restrictions to possible values in the listbox I'have just
>> >> >> noted can be three or four; and all of them can be dependent on what
>> >> >> is currently entered in the form.
>> >> >> -----
>> >> >> Yury Katkov
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Yaron Koren <ya...@wikiworks.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi Yury,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > This sounds like a very different example - here the original,
>> >> >> > "source"
>> >> >> > field is just a hidden field that gets its value from the query
>> >> >> > string.
>> >> >> > In
>> >> >> > that case, I would think the ideal solution would be to use the
>> >> >> > UrlGetParameters extension, to directly use the query string
>> >> >> > value:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:UrlGetParameters
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm not entirely sure that this would work, because I don't
>> >> >> > remember
>> >> >> > which
>> >> >> > parts of the form syntax let you embed a parser function within
>> >> >> > them
>> >> >> > -
>> >> >> > but
>> >> >> > if it doesn't work, then getting it to work would seem like the
>> >> >> > simpler,
>> >> >> > and
>> >> >> > better, solution.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -Yaron
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Yury Katkov
>> >> >> > <katkov.ju...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Hi Yaron!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> My example is surely very silly and synthetic so let's just
>> >> >> >> forget
>> >> >> >> about the flowers
>> >> >> >> I'll try to explain the real problem I faced with in a Foresight
>> >> >> >> wiki.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Here is my problem domain. There are several brainstorming
>> >> >> >> sessions
>> >> >> >> about the forecasts on a distant future, all of them have
>> >> >> >> different
>> >> >> >> topics. Each of those sessions has various objects as the results
>> >> >> >> of
>> >> >> >> the brainstorming: future trends, possible technologies that may
>> >> >> >> appear in the future, possible important events. All these data
>> >> >> >> are
>> >> >> >> loaded to the wiki using the semantic forms. After the
>> >> >> >> brainstorming
>> >> >> >> ends, the participants can improve the objects, categorize them
>> >> >> >> and
>> >> >> >> link them together.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Here for example I have the Trend objects. I want to connect
>> >> >> >> Trends
>> >> >> >> to
>> >> >> >> the Events and to Technologies but only inside the current
>> >> >> >> brainstorming session.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The semantic form for Trend will look like that:
>> >> >> >> <FORM>...
>> >> >> >> {{{field|session name|hidden|required}}} // the only valid way to
>> >> >> >> create a trend is using the #formlink  on a Session's page.
>> >> >> >> Formlink
>> >> >> >> will fill this value with the name of the session
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> {{{field|related events|values from
>> >> >> >> query=[[Category::Event]][[session::$1]]|substitute=Trend[session
>> >> >> >> name] | input type=two listboxes}}}
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> {{{field|related technologies|values from
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> query=[[Category::Technology]][[session::$1]]|substitute=Trend[session
>> >> >> >> name] | input type=two listboxes}}}
>> >> >> >> ...
>> >> >> >> <END OF FORM>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I can use values from concept but it's a very bad workaround if I
>> >> >> >> have
>> >> >> >> many sessions.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I hope now the case is more clear.
>> >> >> >> -----
>> >> >> >> Yury Katkov
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> WikiWorks · MediaWiki Consulting · http://wikiworks.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Reply via email to