"I think that many wikis want Forms to be something strict and
provide some guarantees. Here the argument "it's a wiki" is not
sufficient: some wikis prefer not to show the markup to the users at
all."
Ya know it's impossible to edit annotated values too... is it
thought to shut that down too?
Drupal may be a better fit for the site
in question if there's a need for absolute control of page content or
proprietary templates are involved. Otherwise, I suggest "gardening" to
ensure stored values are within tolerances and attach messages to pages
with bad values or red links, perhaps even dropping those values
whenever the wiki's content is mission-critical.
I think there's
little wrong, and ALOT right, about SF, particularly its embedded
template functionality. If anything for validation, maybe regex formulas
could be attached to a field...
Thanks - john
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
