> I agree with you here. I don't think backwards compatibility is a > compelling reason to keep the property-name-dictates-type feature. I > don't believe there are that many wikis that have such a property > defined without an associated type - and conversely, we know of a few > wikis where this feature has caused problems, that have, for example, > a property named "Telephone number" of type String or Text. I think it > makes a lot of sense to just toss this feature out entirely - it will > cause some short-term pain for a few admins, but in the long term it > will simplify both the code base and the usage of SMW.
Thanks Yaron! So, what do you think should be done next? :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Semediawiki-devel mailing list Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel
