o Andreas Granig [05/29/08 15:59]: > Hi, > > I'd say 488 is the right one, since 415 refers to the format of the body > itself (from my understanding of RFC3261, 21.4.13). thanks for the clarification. I have changed it to throw 488 if no supported codec is found.
Stefan > > Andreas > > Stefan Sayer wrote: >> Hello, >> >> >> >> o Iñaki Baz Castillo [05/29/08 14:43]: >>> Hi, using "early_announcement" application I've realized that when >>> SEMS receives an INVITE with SDP containing "g729" (so non compatible >>> with SEMS) them SEMS replies with: >> ... >> >>> So, why this 606? why not a 488?: >> or is 415 Unsupported Media Type more correct here? >> >> Stefan >> -- Stefan Sayer VoIP Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.iptego.com iptego GmbH Am Borsigturm 40 13507 Berlin Germany Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann _______________________________________________ Sems mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
