El Viernes, 18 de Julio de 2008 15:14, Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió: > El Friday 18 July 2008 15:31:02 Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana escribió: > > El Friday 18 July 2008 12:06:37 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió: > > > El Friday 18 July 2008 07:29:36 Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana escribió: > > > > but also if an > > > > specific timeout is triggered, the received DTMF should be relayed to > > > > UAC B throught OpenSer as if they never arrived at SEMS. > > > > > > Here why don't you just append a branch in OpenSer? > > > or maybe t_replicate? > > > > Because if the "correct dtmf's" arrived on time at SEMS, UAC B do not > > have to hear them, If I do a t_replicate or append a new branch .. they > > will be received at B > > Well, I know, but what is exactly the problem if B receives it? (of course > it caould be non desirable).
Besides that it's not desisable, it could trigger some actions on the remote party that we do no want. -- Saludos. Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Dimensión Virtual S.L. _______________________________________________ Sems mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
