Stefan Sayer writes:
> also, I think that implementing the mediaproxy relay part control in
> SEMS is more work than impelementing RTP packet forward (actually, in
> RTP receiver, it only needs to check whether relay is turned on for
> that session, construct an RTP packet from the buffer, and send the
> packet there).
stefan,
there are the commands that media relay supports:
{'update': set(['call_id', 'from_tag', 'from_uri', 'to_uri', 'cseq',
'user_agent', 'type']),
'remove': set(['call_id', 'from_tag']),
'summary': set(),
'sessions': set()}
which does not look very complicated. update returns media relay
address/port info for this session.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Sems mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems