It looks like: Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 94.25.111.28:5060 ;wlsscid=-40d94a935cd12af0;maddr=94.25.111.28;branch=z9hG4bK83c94213c8c76642c50fb7aeb4f89d35
And comes from: 94.25.111.28:54041 2011/4/1 Vladimir Broz <[email protected]> > Please, how does the incoming Via header look like exactly? > > Thanks, > -Vlada B. > > > > On 04/01/2011 03:57 PM, Alekzander Spiridonov wrote: > >> - 18.2.2 Sending Responses >> >> We have a UAC that sends INVITE from a random port but sets the Via >> header to host:5060 and expects to receive response from UAS (SEMS) on >> port 5060. But SEMS still sends response to that random port. >> >> Is it related to ./sems-1.4.0/core/sip/trans_layer.cpp: >> " >> // TODO: Inspect topmost 'Via' and select proper addr (+resolve DNS >> names) >> // refs: RFC3261 18.2.2; RFC3581 >> " >> >> 2011/4/1 Vladimir Broz <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> On 04/01/2011 03:12 PM, Alekzander Spiridonov wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> SEMS sends SIP-reply not to the host:port from the Via field, >> but to the >> host and port it received request from. Is there any way to fix it? >> >> could you be more specific? What exactly SEMS does not comply to? >> Please, check the sections: >> - 18.2.1 Receiving Requests >> - 18.2.2 Sending Responses >> >> BR, >> -Vlada B. >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Alekzander Spiridonov >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sems mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems >> >> >> >> >> -- >> С уважением, >> Александр Спиридонов >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sems mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems >> > -- Best regards, Alekzander Spiridonov
_______________________________________________ Sems mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
