Juha Heinanen writes: > > in fact, next_hop should support domain names just the same (A & SRV > > records). Have you tried it out? > > no, i haven't. if next_hop does support domain names, then your > next_hop_1st_req patch would be exactly what i was looking for. i'll > give it a try after lunch break.
raphael, with patched sems, i gave this kind config a try: next_hop=sip:internal.test.fi:5070 next_hop_1st_req=yes when sbc tried to send the request out, i got to syslog: Oct 16 14:08:54 siika sems[10851]: [#7fece2f73700] [set_destination_ip, trans_layer.cpp:747] ERROR: Unresolvable Request URI domain and sems responded with 478 Unresolvable destination. domain name internal.test.fi is in dns: $ host internal.test.fi internal.test.fi has address 127.0.0.1 why did sems fail to resolve next_hop uri? -- juha _______________________________________________ Sems mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems
