Stefan Sayer wrote: > > > Raphael Coeffic wrote: >> So the choice is: >> - (1) keep the correct state machine, send ACKs from AmSipDialog >> break unixsockctrl support and modify binrpcctrl to support sending >> ACKs. >> - (2) modify the state machine and simulate SER's behavior in >> sipctrl. This modification should be canceled after we dropped >> unixsockctrl and enable support for ACKs in SEMS applications. >> >> Take the blue or the red pill ;-) > > could we take the second pill, fix other outstanding issues, get 1.0 > out, and then continue doing this straight and without unixsockctrl > limitations? > > If this is changed in AmSipDialog now, I am afraid we'll have more to > re-test. > You are right about the tests. But do you understand from your proposal, that you are taking over the core part (AmSipDialog, AmB2[A]BSession)? ;-)
-Raphael. _______________________________________________ Semsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
