El Viernes, 28 de Noviembre de 2008, Stefan Sayer escribió:
> ok, but how do you think a b2bua should handle this? modify the
> originator in all the replies to match the one of the first reply?

Hi, as I said, this issue wouldn't occur if the To_tag in *each* response sent 
to leg_A would just depend on To_tag in *each* response received in leg_B, 
just it.
This would involve B2BUA becoming various UAS in leg_A (not just one as now), 
this is: one UAS in leg_A for each UAS detected in leg_B (each different 
To_tag received).

If not, the behaviour is wrong since all replies in leg_A should have the same 
SDP, and of course, a pure SIP B2BUA can't handle it (or well, SEMS could do 
it but it's not the point).

I don't know if I've fully replied your question. Best regards.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
Semsdev@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev

Reply via email to