Stefan Sayer writes: > When I started xmlrpc2di I chose xmlrpc++ due to its ease of use and its > embedded server (no other dependencies). you can reimplement it with > xmlrpc-c, that should be doable, but I don't see much advantage in that. > If you cannot install xmlrpc++ from pacakge, you can simply include the > source tree in the sems tree (see make install-xmlrpcpp; or better use > 0.7+cvs20040713-2.1 source from debian stable).
ok, i'll build new lenny packages from 0.7+cvs20040713-2.1 source. perhaps we can then place them available somewhere. -- juha _______________________________________________ Semsdev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
