o Juha Heinanen on 10/13/2011 12:54 PM:
any comments on this one? perhaps it would be better to use quotes
it looks reasonable to me.
just only the question is what should happen if both blacklist and
whitelist is defined.
instead of \,:
P-SDP-Filter: whitelist;list="g729,ilbc,speex,amr"
looks cleaner.
Stefan
-- juha
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
here is an example, how imaginary sdp_filter and header_filter module
behavior could be specified by incoming message:
P-SDP-Filter: whitelist;list=g729\,ilbc\,speex\,amr
P-SDP-Filter: sanity,anonymize
P-Header-Filter: replace;from=sip:[email protected]
P-Header-Filter: blacklist;list=P-Asserted-Identity\,Remote-Party-Identity
P-Header-Filter: add;P-Source-IP=$si,add;P-Source-Port=$sp
the idea thus is that most of the things that are now defined in
profile.conf files, could alternatively be defined by incoming sip
message.
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
