Hi,
o Robert Szokovacs on 10/14/2011 01:22 PM:
Hi,
Do I see correctly in the code that SEMS doesn't support reINVITEs without SDP
currently? Is there any plan to add this?
it's not supported in 1.4 branch, but it's supported in master. if it
doesn't work there, can you open an issue in the tracker with callflow
and debug log, or post a mail?
Also, upon receiving such reINVITE, SEMS stops the session and sends BYE,
which - if I interpret the RFC correctly - is wrong:
https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-14.2
"If the new session description is not acceptable, the UAS can reject it by
returning a 488 (Not Acceptable Here) response for the re-INVITE."
if that's the case, it should be fixed in 1.4.
Stefan
No word about terminating the session in the UAS part.
in the UAC part:
https://wiki.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-14.1
"If a UA receives a non-2xx final response to a re-INVITE, the session
parameters MUST remain unchanged, as if no re-INVITE had been issued."
So I'm not sure if it's bug or not, but usually I would prefer to SEMS to keep
the session as if nothing happened.
Any comments?
TIA
br
Szo
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev
