o Peter Lemenkov on 02/16/2012 03:27 PM:
Hello All.
I've got a proposal to discuss. Since we're using spandsp already and
spandsp is capable of encoding/decoding GSM why not to drop bundled
libgsm and rely on spandsp?


I like to have the base code out of the box be complete for the basic functionality, without too many (i.e., no) dependencies. currently, spandsp is optional. using it for the only option for gsm would make spandsp in a way more mandatory. can't we use the spandsp version if it's there, and alternatively use the bundled one?

stefan
_______________________________________________
Semsdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/semsdev

Reply via email to