https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/a-frivolous-open-ended-war

 


A Frivolous, Open-Ended War


View all posts from this blog 
<https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/blogs/srdja-trifkovic/> 

 

By:Srdja Trifkovic | October 08, 2014

 

There has never been a war in American history so strategically ill-conceived 
as the one currently developing against the Islamic State (IS) in Iraq and 
Syria.

The Mexican war of 1846-47 was essentially an aggressive operation to take Alta 
California and New Mexico, and to cement the status of Texas. It was limited in 
its objectives, and it was conducted in a strategically sound manner. The goals 
– their legality apart – were achieved, and the balance between costs and 
benefits was never in doubt. Vae victis!

The Civil War (under whatever name) was a “rational” bid by Abraham Lincoln and 
his team – legal, moral, and humanitarian considerations notwithstanding – to 
create a centralized state. He won the war, and hugely expanded federal 
governmental power. This was a disaster for America, but it was a resounding 
success from the standpoint of its instigators.

The 1898 war against Spain was but another exercise in Realpolitik. It finally 
moved America from a republic to an empire, the “manifest destiny” now 
manifested in Admiral Mahan’s and Theodore Roosevelt’s geopolitical designs.

Woodrow Wilson’s 1917-1918 intervention against the Central Powers was the 
first overtly “ideological” war – to make the world safe for democracy etc. Its 
slogans were silly, but in the end it could be argued that the geopolitical 
purpose was well served: to prevent the dominance of the continent of Europe by 
a single hegemon. America did not make much difference to the outcome in the 
battlefield, but her entry signaled to the Germans that the Entente could not 
lose.

World War II was a convoluted affair that entailed FDR provoking Japan in order 
to provoke Germany. Considering Roosevelt’s Weltanschauung it worked 
beautifully. His goals were rational within that paradigm, and they were 
fulfilled beyond expectations.

The war in Korea was a prompt response to an outright act of aggression in the 
disputed “Rimland” of the early Cold War. Truman, for all his failings, was 
right in preventing Douglas McArthur from turning it into an existential 
struggle. The truce of 1953 still stands. It was a limited war, of limited 
duration, for limited objectives.

With Vietnam we enter a murky territory. By 1968 the gap between political 
objectives and military means had become painfully obvious, for the first time 
in American history. It took the courage and vision of Richard Nixon – a 
statesman par excellence unjustly maligned to this day – to end that 
military-political quagmire. Today’s Vietnam, far from being a bastion of 
Communist orthodoxy, is a flourishing capitalist economy and America’s de facto 
ally in curtailing Beijing’s ambitions in the South China Sea.

The 1990’s were a disaster. Bill Clinton bombed the Bosnian Serbs in 1994-95, 
thus making Sarajevo safe for the foreign jihadists who are now providing the 
foreign backbone for the Islamic State. He bombed Serbia in 1999, thus making 
Kosovo safe for their Albanian cohorts. The oft-stated intent, that America is 
helping “moderate” Muslims, has never paid any dividends.

The decade following 9/11 was even worse. After two failed wars, in Afghanistan 
the Taliban will eventually take over, period. Iraq is a failed state, with the 
new Shiite prime minister rearranging the deck chairs on the sinking ship. 
Trillions of dollars and thousands of American lives were utterly wasted.

And now we have a new war, against the Islamic State (IS, or ISIL, as Obama 
prefers to call it). There is no strategy, no operational tactical plan, no 
end-game. Air strikes with no boots on the ground. We are told, with disgusting 
complacency, that this war may last thirty years (Leon Panetta), or for ever 
(Newt Gingrich). Our “allies” in Ankara are watching calmly as the Kurds in 
Kobani succumb to IS attacks. The Turks and Saudi Arabia – our “allies” – want 
to finish off Bashar al-Sadat first and foremost, the only man who has the 
viable fighting force ready and willing to confront the IS.

This is postmodernia at its best. God help us.

 

-- 
Ову поруку сте добили зато што сте пријављени на Google групу „SERBIAN NEWS 
NETWORK“.
Да бисте отказали пријаву у ову групу и престали да примате имејлове од ње, 
пошаљите имејл на [email protected].
Да бисте постављали у овој групи, пошаљите е-поруку на [email protected].
Посетите ову групу на http://groups.google.com/group/senet.
За више опција посетите https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to