Inside Obama’s Secret Outreach to Russia

3252 Dec 31, 2014 10:59 AM EST 

By Josh Rogin  <http://www.bloombergview.com/contributors/joshua-rogin> 

President Barack Obama's administration has been working behind the scenes for 
months to forge a new working relationship with Russia, despite the fact that 
Russian President Vladimir Putin has shown little interest in repairing 
relations with Washington or halting his aggression in neighboring Ukraine.

This month, Obama's National Security Council finished an extensive and 
comprehensive review of U.S policy toward Russia that included dozens of 
meetings and input from the State Department, Defense Department and several 
other agencies, according to three senior administration officials. At the end 
of the sometimes-contentious process, Obama made a decision to continue to look 
for ways to work with Russia on a host of bilateral and international issues 
while also offering Putin a way out of the stalemate over the crisis in Ukraine.

“I don’t think that anybody at this point is under the impression that a 
wholesale reset of our relationship is possible at this time, but we might as 
well test out what they are actually willing to do,” a senior administration 
official told me. “Our theory of this all along has been, let's see what’s 
there. Regardless of the likelihood of success.”

Leading the charge has been Secretary of State John Kerry. This fall, Kerry 
even proposed going to Moscow and meeting with Putin directly. The negotiations 
over Kerry’s trip got to the point of scheduling, but ultimately were scuttled 
because there was little prospect of demonstrable progress.

In a separate attempt at outreach, the White House turned to an old friend of 
Putin’s for help. The White House called on former Secretary of State Henry 
Kissinger to discuss having him call Putin directly, according to two 
officials. It’s unclear whether Kissinger actually made the call. The White 
House and Kissinger both refused to comment for this column.

Kerry has been the point man on dealing with Russia because his close 
relationship with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov represents the last 
remaining functional diplomatic channel between Washington and Moscow. They 
meet often, often without any staff members present, and talk on the phone 
regularly. Obama and Putin, on the other hand, are known to have an intense 
dislike for each other and very rarely speak.

In several conversations with Lavrov, Kerry has floated an offer to Russia that 
would pave the way for a partial release of some of the most onerous economic 
sanctions. Kerry’s conditions included Russia adhering to September's Minsk 
agreement 
<http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/poroshenko-despite-minsk-agreements-martial-law-is-still-an-option-376395.html>
  and ceasing direct military support for the Ukrainian separatists. The issue 
of Crimea would be set aside for the time being, and some of the initial 
sanctions that were put in place after Crimea’s annexation would be kept in 
place.

“We are willing to isolate the issues of Donetsk and Luhansk from the issue of 
Crimea,” another senior administration official told me, naming two regions in 
Eastern Ukraine under separatist control. “If there was a settlement on Donetsk 
and Luhansk, there could be a removal of some sanctions while maintaining 
sanctions with regard to Crimea. That represents a way forward for Putin.”

Meanwhile, Kerry has been proposing increased U.S.-Russian cooperation on a 
wide range of international issues. Earlier this month, he invited Lavrov to a 
last-minute diplomatic confab 
<http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-30471854>  in Rome to discuss the 
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

After one meeting with Lavrov in Paris in October, Kerry announced 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/15/world/europe/us-and-russia-agree-to-share-more-intelligence-on-isis.html?_r=0>
  that he had discussed potential U.S.-Russian cooperation on Afghanistan, 
Iran, North Korea, Syria and Yemen. But the apparent warming was overshadowed 
by Lavrov’s quick denial 
<http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/22/u-s-and-russia-can-t-agree-on-whether-they-agreed-to-coordinate-on-isis.html>
  of Kerry’s claim that Russia had agreed to assist in the U.S.-led coalition 
against Islamic State in Iraq.

Kerry has seemed more enthusiastic about mending ties with Russia than Obama 
himself. After the president gave a blistering critique of Russian behavior in 
a major United Nations speech, saying that “Russian aggression in Europe 
recalls the days when large nations trampled small ones in pursuit of 
territorial ambition,” Kerry urged Lavrov to ignore his boss’s remarks, 
according to Lavrov. “Kerry said we have so many serious things to discuss that 
of course that was unfortunate, let’s not focus on that,” Lavrov told Russian 
reporters.

State Department officials insist that Kerry is clear-eyed about the challenges 
of trying to work with Russia, but that he believes there is no other 
responsible option than to see what can be accomplished.

“Secretary Kerry is not advocating internally or with Russia for a reset in the 
relationship, and in fact in meetings he has taken a strong and at times 
skeptical stance,” one senior State Department official told me. “As the 
nation's chief diplomat he is simply always exploring ways to make 
relationships more productive.”

There is also a belief among many both inside the State Department and the 
White House that sanctions are working. The Russian economy is tanking, albeit 
due largely to collapsing oil prices and not targeted punishments. One senior 
administration official argued that absent the sanctions, Putin might have been 
even more aggressive in Ukraine. Moreover, this official said, the sanctions 
need time to work and might yet prove to have greater effect on Putin’s 
decision-making in the months ahead: "We’ll see how they feel as their economy 
continues to deteriorate and the Ukrainian economy refuses to collapse.”

If the Russians are getting ready to cave, they aren’t showing it. Putin 
remains defiant and Russian military assistance to the Ukrainian rebels 
continues. The Russian leadership has been rejecting Kerry’s overtures both in 
public and private. Diplomatic sources said that Lavrov has refused to even 
discuss Kerry’s conditions for partial easing of sanctions. And Putin has made 
a hobby of bashing <http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/23406>  the U.S. in public 
remarks. 

To many of the administration’s critics, especially Republicans on Capitol 
Hill, pursuing engagement with Moscow is based on naivety and wishful thinking.

“It’s a strategy worthy in the finest tradition of Neville Chamberlain,” 
incoming Senate Armed Services Chairman John McCain told me. “I think the 
Russians are doing fine. Meanwhile, what price has Vladimir Putin paid? Very 
little.”

The legislative branch has also been active on Russia this year, but its 
efforts run counter to the administration’s policy and sometimes have the 
indirect effect of putting more roadblocks in front of the Obama-Kerry push to 
find a way forward.

On Dec. 18, Obama reluctantly signed a bill authorizing new Russia sanctions 
<http://www.rferl.org/content/obama-russia-ukraine-aid-bill-sanctions/26751408.html>
  and military aid to Ukraine that was overwhelmingly passed by Congress. 
Afterward, the White House awkwardly said that the legislation did not signify 
any change in policy. 

And this week, the State Department sanctioned four more Russian officials, but 
not over Ukraine. The officials were added to a list of human rights violators 
under the Sergei Magnitsky Act of 2012, named after the anti-corruption lawyer 
who died in a Russian prison. In response, the Russian foreign ministry issued 
a statement 
<http://www.rferl.org/content/russia-us-sanctions-magnitsky/26769720.html>  
saying that the Magnitsky Act sanctions "place in question the prospects for 
bilateral cooperation in resolving the situation surrounding the Iranian 
nuclear program, the Syrian crisis, and other acute international issues."

These latest punishments show that it may be impossible to de-link the problems 
in the bilateral relationship from the opportunities, as the Obama 
administration wants to do. They also show that there will always be chances 
for those in Washington and Moscow who want to stoke the tensions to do so, 
jeopardizing any progress.

Some experts believe that any plan to warm U.S.-Russian relations is unlikely 
to succeed because it doesn’t have the full support of either president.

“It’s very clear that between the Putin Kremlin and the Obama White House there 
is a very bad chemistry. Its not a question of simply distrust, it’s a question 
of intense dislike between the two leaders,” said Dimitri Simes 
<http://www.cftni.org/dksimes.html> , president of the Center for the National 
Interest.

Also, some experts feel, placing the diplomacy in the Kerry-Lavrov channel 
dooms its outcome, because the Russians know that Kerry himself has no power to 
make major decisions and Lavrov has to be careful not to be seen as cozying up 
to the U.S.

“The more Kerry creates a perception he has a special relationship with Lavrov, 
the more he puts Lavrov in a difficult position with officials in his own 
capital, starting with Putin,” said Simes. “It’s clear that when Kerry deals 
with Lavrov and hopes that because they have overlapping interests, that would 
allow cooperation where useful, that is not a model of relationship that Putin 
is prepared to accept.”

Obama has made it clear that in his last two years in office he is prepared to 
make big moves on foreign policy even if they face political or legislative 
opposition, such as normalizing relations with Cuba or pursuing a nuclear deal 
with Iran. But when it comes to Russia, he is unwilling to place his own 
credibility behind any outreach to his nemesis Putin.

The administration’s cautious engagement with Moscow is logical: Why not seek a 
balance in a complicated and important bilateral relationship? But by choosing 
a middle ground between conciliation and confrontation -- not being generous 
enough to entice Russia's cooperation yet not being tough enough to stop 
Putin’s aggression in Eastern Europe -- Obama’s policy risks failing on both 
fronts. 

To contact the author on this story:
Josh Rogin at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-12-31/inside-obamas-secret-outreach-to-russia

-- 
Ову поруку сте добили зато што сте пријављени на Google групу „SERBIAN NEWS 
NETWORK“.
Да бисте отказали пријаву у ову групу и престали да примате имејлове од ње, 
пошаљите имејл на [email protected].
Да бисте постављали у овој групи, пошаљите е-поруку на [email protected].
Посетите ову групу на http://groups.google.com/group/senet.
За више опција посетите https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to