How Putin can win global economic war against Russia
17.03.2015    What are the objectives of the global economic war against 
Russia? Will the West disconnect Russia from SWIFT? Will Europe and the USA 
impose more sanctions on Russia? What's happening to the oil prices? Will 
Syrian President Bashar Assad surrender? Pravda.Ru asked these and other 
questions in an interview with Ron Holland, author of many best-selling booksIt 
has been a year since the US economic war against Russia began by the West. 
Which objectives have been set and have they been achieved?I would suggest the 
objectives have been three fold but in fact I would date the sanctions war from 
Friday August 30, 2013. This was when President Putin offered a peaceful 
alternative at the last moment to stop the US military operation against Bashar 
al-Assad and Syria that was within hours of starting. Surprisingly the US 
called off the attack and this set in motion a series of events contrary to the 
goals of the US administration. I believe both Russia and China covertly played 
the Treasury debt card in order to protect their client states, Syria and Iran, 
from the impending US invasion.   I wrote in my September editorial at that 
time; Did Putin Quietly Play the Debt Card Over Syria that both Russia and 
China might have covertly played the Treasury debt card in order to protect 
their allies, Syria and Iran, from an impending US invasion.Thus the planned 
Syrian invasion was to first secure the land route to build the Qatar-Turkey 
pipeline designed to end European dependence on Russian gas and pipelines. 
Second was to put US forces on the land border of Iran when they had secured 
Syria in order to ratchet up the pressure on Iran to give in to Washington 
demands. The third reason was to close any potential base options for the 
Russian Black Sea Fleet in the Mediterranean on the Syrian coast just prior to 
the move on Ukraine and Crimea both planned to vacate both the Russia fleet and 
bases as well as secure the oil and gas shipping pipelines and Black Sea 
transit. None of these objectives were attained.         Another major defeat 
was the Washington & London scheme to force Russia out of SWIFT, the Society of 
Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications, as this entity is how banks 
globally transfer funds. But on Monday March 9, SWIFT didn't kick Russia out 
but rather offered Russia a seat on the board.Now this wasn't because SWIFT was 
trying to be fair but because the Western controlled entity is now faced with 
competition from CIPS, the new China International Payment System which Russia 
plans to join. This will offer a new option allowing global banks to 
communicate and transfer funds that does not depend on fair treatment or a 
"hands off" attitude by US politicians.So although Russia has escaped most of 
the sanctions and threats to date, the financial costs to Russia have been 
great for resisting the US, as low oil prices, hence currency war and a growing 
list of US sanctions have caused Russia to incur significant costs for 
resisting Washington domination and control.Because of anti-Russian sanctions 
the EU lost €21 billion. Such data was given by the Spain's Minister of Foreign 
Affairs and Cooperation José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil. When will Europe 
go the length of lifting sanctions that were imposed under the pressure of the 
US from your point of view? Or will they be strengthening sanctions?
Well there already appears to be a split between many of the EU nations and 
Germany and the foreign policy dictates of the United States. While the length 
and severity of the sanctions are somewhat dependent upon Russian actions 
regarding the Ukraine, they would certainly strengthen should Russia or the 
separatist New Russia forces advance further into the Ukraine along the lines. 
Still ultimately the lifting of sanctions will happen only when the political 
and economic costs to Europe exceed the pressure that is brought to bear by the 
United States. My recommendations further down in this interview would cause a 
quick lifting of sanctions because they threaten the profits of German and 
European banks to Russian "Swiss style" competition.Some experts believe that 
the reason of economic crisis in Russia are not the Western sanctions, but 
decrease in oil price. What do you think?While I think it is an organized 
action by the US and Saudi Arabia, it's success to date in dramatically 
lowering oil prices has been possible because of the global recession and 
worldwide drop in demand for oil. The price of oil would have pulled back in 
any case but the policy has made the downtrend worse and of a longer duration. 
But understand this is a complicated situation not just aimed at Russia as this 
also dramatically cuts revenue for Iran another nation in opposition to US 
hegemony. Also Sunni Saudi Arabia rightly fears Shia Iran, as most of the Saudi 
oil resources are right across the Persian Gulf from Iran including the world's 
largest, the Ghawer field and most of the 15% Saudi Shite minority population 
lives in the area where the reserves are located. Remember the Shite/Sunni 
divide in Islam makes the Israel/Arab conflict pale in comparison and the Saudi 
Shites are treated quite badly so they and the Saudi oil reserves could become 
a fertile ground for Iranian actions.Is it an organized act by the US and Saudi 
Arabia? If it is so, then Obama deliberately endangered the shale miracle in 
the US, didn't he?Yes, as I answered in the question above it is an organized 
act by the US and Saudi Arabia but the leadership of Saudi Arabia jumped both 
at the chance to close the fracking and shale oil production competition in the 
United States as well as to put pressure on their arch enemy Iran.Also much of 
the oil production industry votes and supports Republican candidates rather 
than the Democrats so Obama is not paying a huge political price. Finally 
although shale oil production is not profitable unless oil is near $100 a 
barrel, the public had already loaded up on these junk bonds and Wall Street 
had made their money so it was time to fleece the unsophisticated investors. 
Regardless of US shale oil production or losses, the opportunity to bring 
financial pressure against Iran and Russia was worth the cost to the Washington 
political leadership.What is needed for the oil price starting to rise at last? 
Tyler Durden  believes that it is Putin who should surrender Bashar al-Assad, 
who does not give permission for gas pipeline installation from Qatar to 
Europe. Do you agree?It is too late to surrender Bashar al-Assad and allow the 
Qatar pipeline as Washington has bigger fish to fry, ie. Russia and Iran the 
last major energy suppliers outside of US domination and control. Two events 
have to happen before oil gets expensive again. First, the price of oil will 
rise when the global recession has ended and the world economy picks up again. 
I believe the recession in China and the rest of the world is just starting and 
it is related to overhanging amount of government debt and bonds floating 
around the world. I really don't know how governments and the central banks get 
us out of the looming debt crisis without wholesale debt repudiation.Second, 
Washington must decide that the disadvantages of artificially low oil prices 
hurt the US economy more than the intended victims Iran and Russia.As for 
Germany and the EU, Hitler's violent goal of lebensraum for living spaces to 
farm, trade and grow food for the Reich at the expense of the Russian people 
has today been modernized to a longing for Russian natural resources ranging 
from timber, mining to oil and gas in order to benefit Europe and Washington. I 
believe their goal is economic rather than a military threat and this is just 
an expansion of an ongoing natural resource grab outside the Middle East as the 
long-term challenge for world supremacy between Washington & Wall Street VS 
China and the Asian tigers slowly develop.The issuance of unredeemable 
government debt and bonds are the ultimate control mechanism by the Western 
interests utilized in order to keep politicians, national leaders and nations 
in line and march in lockstep to their economic programs. Russia under Putin is 
not over indebted like almost all other western nations thus allowing Putin to 
exercise leadership independent of European and Washington demands and this 
makes Russia in their eyes a threat to the continuation of the fake debt 
democracy system across the West.The ultimate goal is to destabilize Russia by 
destroying the economy and limiting government revenue and growth by holding 
oil prices at historically low levels. To do this they must depose Putin, the 
national leader with the highest poll approval rating in the world and replace 
him with a compliant quisling type of leadership submissive to western 
interests as has been done in Ukraine. This goal could be achieved due to 
Russia's extreme over dependence on energy resource revenue.In my view it 
wasn't the arms race, total failure of Russian communism to benefit the masses 
nor the inability to compete with the western market economies that overthrew 
the communist party leadership in the former Soviet Union and the rest of the 
Warsaw Pact countries. Rather it was the government debt burden of Moscow and 
it's other eastern European client states that eventually destroyed the Eastern 
Bloc as political leaders increasingly tried to improve their low standards of 
living and satisfy consumers through government borrowing from western 
banks.This policy worked for the West and the Soviet style communism is 
thankfully no more but this is the same policy used today by Washington and in 
the European Union in order to control the destiny and leadership of what 
should be independent national governments. As you see with Greece, even in 
voting democracies where the citizens demand a change, there can be no change 
because all politicians are subservient to powerful foreign banking interests.I 
would suggest that Washington is indeed acting rationally if their goal is to 
preserve their power base as well as the support of powerful banking and 
economic interests. The US Empire has indeed reached it's zenith of power and 
authority in the world and as America heads downhill as have all major empires 
in the past. Therefore it is crucial to buy time by attempting to conquer or 
control energy resources around the world hence why the US is involved across 
the Middle East and increasingly in the Ukraine and is surrounding Russia and 
Iran.Their goal for Russia, now the ultimate ally of a resurgent China is 
economic vassalage, territorial dismemberment and the development of "spheres 
of influence" just like Great Britain did to India and the western countries 
including Russia did to a weakened China in the 19th century.Will Putin go the 
length of it?Well this is a tough question for a non-Russian to comment on. He 
is the best politician on the planet evidenced by his poll numbers and there is 
no question he is a patriot and wants the best for his country, the people and 
of course your powerful oligarchs.I love the Washington propaganda always 
lambasting the evil Russian oligarchs because every country including the 
United States have their own powerful interests or oligarchs that seek to use 
government as a tool for their best interests. This is nothing new or sinister 
as government and politicians everywhere have always operated this way.Yes, I 
believe Putin and Russia will survive this attack on Russian sovereignty and 
it's over emphasis on energy resource revenue which is a mistake made by Russia 
not by western interests. This economic war will end in stalemate because 
Russia cannot be subdued by invasion, history shows us that and the increasing 
alliance with China and other BRICS will help with better economic growth.But I 
don't consider a standoff as a victory for Putin or Russia. It is just 
maintaining the status quo with Russia still at risk from western expansionism 
and the control of your natural resources. Russia is now engaged in an 
asymmetrical war with the American and European Union primarily over resources 
and the strategy and tactics really differ between the West and Russia. 
Washington failed in goading Russia into a military invasion of Ukraine as this 
could have drawn in other European nations thus further weakening the Russian 
economy but the economic, currency and financial warfare will continue 
hopefully short of military action.To date Russia only reacts to western 
sanctions and economic warfare against your energy industry thus there is 
neither real pain for the west nor any reason for them not to ratchet up the 
sanctions against individuals, banking and other interests. They are logically 
attacking your weakest link, the energy and financial sectors and they 
certainly do not expect a major response from your side. Still dumping Treasury 
debt by Russia or China would probably be counter productive and both nations 
would be smart of liquidate US dollar debt in an organized regular fashion 
during this near term period of tremendous dollar strength. This is probably 
your last chance to unload US Treasury debt at a profit.A defensive war 
strategy even in an economic war is not a recipe for victory but rather a 
guarantor of future wars or ultimate defeat. Putin and Russia can win this 
economic war quite easily if you think and act outside the box so to speak. The 
West is legitimately attacking your economy at its weakest link, your over 
dependence on the energy sector hence why low oil prices and the gas pipeline 
revolution in the Ukraine were smart moves by your energy adversaries.Utilize 
your strengths and western weaknesses in your peaceful economic and financial 
responses to the challenges they have made to your country. I've spent my 
entire career in the financial industry and this is not rocket science on how 
to successfully counter western political moves against you.The weakness of the 
Western banking and economic interests are massive government debt, the end of 
the dollar as the world reserve currency and nationalism within the EU. There 
is no way citizens or companies can escape the high taxes, massive debt service 
costs and the inability of citizens or companies within Europe to escape their 
high tax, regulatory environment that is killing the economy of Europe in order 
to defend the primarily German banking interests. Financial privacy and all 
wealth in Europe are at risk from future bail-ins where depositor's funds are 
used to pay for excessive bank lending losses. We've already seen it in Cyprus 
and soon it will happen in Greece and the PIGGS countries.To win, you must have 
other powerful economic interests outside Russia who can benefit and profit 
from a sovereign independent Russia. The US has destroyed financial privacy and 
confidentially around the world and no nation can stand up to their powerful 
threats to other banking interests which means the private wealth of the entire 
West will eventually be at risk of bank bail-ins, confiscation of retirement 
funds and confiscatory tax rates when the bond crisis finally hit because there 
is no secure alternative to protecting honest earned wealth.As I've written in 
earlier editorials, Russia can win the financial/energy/economic war only by 
finding new sources of revenue outside the energy sector and playing on its 
unique strengths. A low tax rate and friendly regulatory environment to attract 
European/American industry and money is a start. It appears Russia is now 
moving to offer economic citizenships and tax advantages in order to attract 
entrepreneurs as I wrote a couple of months ago and this will help.For example, 
I'm a skier and where can you ski in the winter and enjoy a tropical climate 
the other 6 months outside of a couple of very expensive locations in 
Switzerland, Italy and France? You have skiing at Krasnaya Polyana less than an 
hour from Sochi on the Russian Riviera the site of the 2014 Olympics that could 
become another Hong Kong with the climate advantages and low taxes and secure 
banking opportunities. Plus you have a relatively empty Olympic village that 
could be remodeled into condos and flats for foreign entrepreneurs and 
investors.Finally Russia must get aggressive in the economic war. You can win 
this economic contest in 24 months, if certain special zones in Russia simply 
are allowed to copy Swiss banking rules and regulations, as wealth will always 
flow to secure locations where taxes are low. You know what banking privacy and 
security did for Switzerland, it made a poor country with few natural resources 
the wealthiest nation in the world. You will have foreign banks and financial 
institutions lining up to open offices in Russia if you can guarantee financial 
privacy to a degree and wealth protection in total.This will break the monopoly 
of West in financial and banking as well as their power to threaten you. The 
coming bond debacle guarantees this will work as I've written earlier every 
nation has wealthy interests and their own oligarchs so why not build support 
for Russia from wealthy foreigners as they transfer a portion of their wealth 
as taxable income at a very low rate to your nation. This will end the economic 
war.Will there be set peace in Ukraine in the near future? Which role will the 
US have in it?No the Ukraine is caught between competing sides in the East VS 
West conflict. Sadly it will likely end up like Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan as 
a battleground and non functioning state at least economically and maybe 
militarily caught between the US and EU verses Russia. Russia will protect the 
Russian speakers and likely will open a land route to the Crimea and maybe as 
far west as Odessa thus cutting off the Ukraine from the Black Sea. Still all 
Russia needs is a Ukraine non-aligned with the West or a member of NATO. The US 
will continue to promote instability in the Ukraine for the foreseeable 
future.Ron HollandRonald Holland is the author of several books as well as 
numerous special reports and hundreds of articles on finance, investments, 
history and politics. He speaks and moderates frequently at financial and 
free-market conferences and has developed Swiss oriented financial products in 
the US and Switzerland and his lived and worked in the US, Switzerland and 
Canada. He was head of a bank trust department, president of an investment firm 
licensed in 47 states and involved in resort real estate marketing and sales. 
He consults with a wide range of individuals, corporations and entities. Ron 
Holland can be reached at [email protected]

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/senet.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to