'Crimea: Way Back Home' as seen through Western eye
17.03.2015   The most important thing that Western media saw in the documentary 
"Crimea: Way Back Home" that was shown on Russian television on Sunday, March 
15, was Putin's readiness to set Russian nuclear forces on full combat 
readiness, if the West had taken effort to impede the referendum in the Crimea. 
Traditionally, Western media accuse Russian President Vladimir Putin of lies 
and bragging to intimidate Kiev. Yet, even Western journalists do not deny that 
the Crimeans are happy to return to Russia. "The documentary in the form of an 
interview with Vladimir Putin "Crimea: Way Back Home" about the "annexation" of 
the Ukrainian territory was shown on Russian television on the anniversary of 
the referendum in the Crimea," the Polish newspaper Wiadomości.wp.pl wrote. The 
West and Kiev condemn the "annexation" as a violation of international law, 
while Moscow presents it as an act of historical justice, the Polish newspaper 
wrote and then attempted to trip Putin.     "Moscow originally denied that its 
soldiers took part in the Crimean events. However, in the documentary, Putin 
admitted that he ordered to consider the options to annex the Crimea prior to 
the referendum, namely, after Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych was removed 
from power, the newspaper said. If there had been "problems with the Crimea," 
Russia would have been ready to set its nuclear forces on full combat 
readiness, the Polish publication wrote. Russia's readiness to use nuclear 
weapons permeates through all news reports about the documentary. "Vladimir 
Putin has admitted that he was ready to place his nuclear attack forces on 
alert when he seized Crimea a year ago" The Daily Mail said. "The president 
explained that he knew the West could have intervened, and had been 'ready' to 
put his nuclear arsenal on alert, adding: 'I talked with colleagues and told 
them that Crimea is our historic territory. We were ready to do it," the 
newspaper wrote.           "The documentary portrayed Crimea's annexation as a 
heroic emancipation of the peninsula from an onslaught of Ukrainian extremists 
trained by U.S. puppeteers. The peninsula's annexation last year helped drive 
the Russian leader's popularity to all-time highs at home but led to the worst 
divide between the West and Russia since the days of the Cold War," The Wall 
Street Journal said. The American publication notes that the documentary 
contained a story of how a US Navy destroyer was detected in the Black Sea. To 
stop the US vessel, K-300P Bastion coastal defense missile systems in Crimea 
were deployed. "We deployed them so they could be seen clearly from space," Mr. 
Putin said. Many Western publications paid attention to the following remarks 
from Russian President Putin: "The Crimea is our historical territory. Russian 
people live there. They were in danger. We cannot abandon them." Carol J. 
Williams of Los Angeles Times wrote that "Putin accused the United States of 
masterminding the three-month uprising in the Ukrainian capital that ended with 
the ouster of Kremlin-allied President Viktor Yanukovych." "The United States, 
along with Poland and Lithuania, "facilitated the armed coup" by training the 
nationalists, Putin said," the journalist wrote. Other Western mass media 
produced reports about one year of life in the Crimea "in the hands of the 
Kremlin." According to Euronews, life in the Crimea has changed a lot. Salaries 
and pensions have grown, the quality of social services has raised along with 
unemployment and prices. Food prices have doubled, whereas the inflation rate 
has soared 38 percent up, the news channel said with reference to the Crimean 
authorities. Pilar Bonet of El Pais, Spain, wrote that there were enough 
consumer goods in the  Crimea, although food products supplies have not been 
stable due to problematic shipments via the Kerch Strait and Ukraine's 
Blockade. Water is deficit, tourism revenues have dropped considerably. To 
crown it all, the crisis has deprived the Crimea of the promised investment 
from Moscow. "The streets and roads on the peninsula are in deplorable state, 
although the number of cars has been growing. The Tatar minority is heavily 
guarded, whereas its leaders were either jailed or exiled to Kiev," Bonet 
wrote. As you can see, "repression in the Crimea" is another fertile subject 
for Western media. In addition to the Tatar factor, Western journalists 
indicate that Ukrainian symbols (for example, the Ukrainian flag) in the Crimea 
are banned and journalists are not allowed to include pro-Ukrainian slogans in 
their reports, Serbian news agency Tanjug said. "Crimea is a special place for 
Russians, simply because at some point almost every Russian citizen has spent 
happy vacation days on the sunny Black Sea peninsula. With its attractive 
climate, Crimea has been a place of recreation and longing in Russian culture 
since the 19th century," Ingo Mannteufel, the chief of the Russian service of 
DW-WORLD.DE wrote in his op-ed. "In Soviet times Crimea was the most popular 
tourist destination in the country. From the early 1960s on, millions of 
Russian workers took their hard earned vacations on the peninsula. Even when 
Ukraine became independent after the collapse of the Soviet Union, hundreds of 
thousands of Russians continued to flock to Crimea every year," he continued. 
"It should come as no surprise that many Russians consider Crimea to be "their" 
peninsula. And when Crimea "returned to Russia" exactly one year ago on March 
18, 2014, many Russians saw it as the result of some kind of historical 
justice," Ingo Mannteufel wrote. "The US and the European Union cannot and will 
not accept such a fundamental breach of international law, especially since 
Putin has become increasingly open about Russia's role in guiding the Crimean 
referendum...A true easing of tensions between Russia and the West can only 
come about after the legal status of Crimea has been settled internationally - 
either through a return of Crimea to Ukrainian sovereignty, or through a treaty 
between Russia and Ukraine in which an independent Ukrainian leadership freely 
surrenders its rights to the peninsula in accordance with international law. In 
light of Putin's authoritarian path, both of these scenarios are utterly 
illusory at the moment," the German journalist concluded. The Crimeans are 
happy about Russia's move to reunite with the peninsula, Christian Science 
Monitor said. "Moscow has paid a heavy price for its actions, with its economy 
sagging under the weight of Western sanctions, while Russia's image around the 
world has suffered a black eye over its actions in Ukraine," the publication 
said. "A telephone poll conducted by a German firm among Crimeans in January 
found that over 80 percent of respondents were happy to be newly-minted 
Russians," Christian Science Monitor wrote.  The most important lesson of 
Russia's reunification with the Crimea is the fact that Russia has protected 
the Crimeans from what is currently happening in Ukraine. Lyuba LulkoPravda.Ru 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/senet.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to