Russia vetoes Srebrenica genocide resolution at UN
Moscow’s ambassador condemns security council resolution to mark 20th anniversary of killing of 8,000 Muslim men and boys as ‘politically motivated’ <http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/08/russia-vetoes-srebrenica-genocide-resolution-un#img-1> <http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/08/russia-vetoes-srebrenica-genocide-resolution-un#img-1> A memorial near Srebrenica. China, Nigeria, Angola and Venezuela abstained and the remaining 10 members of the security council voted in favour. Photograph: Dado Ruvic/Reuters Reuters Wednesday 8 July 2015 17.39 BST Last modified on Thursday 9 July 2015 00.03 BST Russia has vetoed a United Nations security council resolution that would have condemned the Srebrenica massacre <http://www.theguardian.com/world/srebrenica-massacre> as a genocide. The resolution was intended to mark the 20th anniversary of the killing of 8,000 Muslim men and boys. China, Nigeria, Angola and Venezuela abstained and the remaining 10 members of the council voted in favour. Revealed: the role of the west in the runup to Srebrenica’s fall Read more The vote was delayed a day as Britain and the US tried to persuade Russia <http://www.theguardian.com/world/russia> not to veto the resolution, which would have also condemned denial that the 1995 massacre was a genocide. Russia’s UN ambassador, Vitaly Churkin, said the UK-drafted resolution was “not constructive, confrontational and politically motivated”. Russia had instead proposed condemning “the most serious crimes of concern to the international community”. A UN war crimes tribunal in The Hague ruled in 2004 <http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/apr/20/warcrimes> that the Srebrenica massacre was a genocide. Srebrenica 20 years on: 'Every year I think this is the year I will bury my son' Read more On 11 July 1995, toward the end of Bosnia’s 1992-95 war, Bosnian Serb forces swept into the eastern Srebrenica enclave, a UN-designated “safe haven”. They killed 8,000 Muslim men and boys in the days that followed, dumping their bodies in pits. “Our vote against … will not however mean that we are deaf to the sufferings of the victims of Srebrenica and other areas of Bosnia-Herzegovina <http://www.theguardian.com/world/bosnia-and-herzegovina> ,” Churkin said before the vote, adding that such a resolution would lead to greater regional tension. Serbia <http://www.theguardian.com/world/serbia> acknowledges that a “grave crime” took place and adopted a declaration condemning the massacre in 2010 as it sought closer ties with the west, but stopped short of describing it as genocide. Serbia warned on Tuesday that the resolution would only widen ethnic divisions in neighbouring Bosnia. <http://gu.com/p/4afte/sbl> http://gu.com/p/4afte/sbl Envoyé de mon iPad= -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/senet. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
