rtklive.com <http://www.rtklive.com/en/news-single.php?ID=14323>
"Negotiating team in contradiction with Constitution" RTKLive 3-4 minutes _____ The Constitutional Court of Kosovo has found that the State Delegation, which was established by the challenged Law, is not foreseen by the Constitution, and is not foreseen within the form of government and separation of power. As such, the state delegation cannot be involved in the interaction of separation, control and balance of powers and cannot interfere in the form of governance, namely the structure of separation of power, as defined by Article 4 of the Constitution. "The Court further found that the transfer of competences of the constitutional institutions to the "special mechanism" established in the challenged Law is an interference with the exercise of competences of the constitutional institutions provided by the Constitution. The transfer of competences to the "special mechanism" represents interference in the form of governance, separation of power, and is not in compliance with the democratic values and the rule of law, as set forth in Article 7 of the Constitution, because it vests in the state delegation the functions which do not comply with constitutional norms. The Court also found that the constitutional norms, expressly envisaged an obligation regarding the exercise of constitutional competencies in the sphere of foreign policy for the competent institutions. The power to dialogue with a third country cannot be transferred to the state delegation as a "special mechanism" through a lower legal act such as the challenged Law. In addition, the Court found that the Assembly of the Republic of Kosovo is obliged to oversee the foreign policy within the constitutional competences foreseen under paragraph 12 of Article 65 of the Constitution. The Court also emphasized that paragraph 1 of Article 93 of the Constitution determines the competences of the Government to "propose and implement the internal and foreign policies of the country", and paragraphs 1 and 9 of Article 94, provide that the Prime Minister as the head of the Government "represents and leads the Government" and "Consults with the President on the implementation of the foreign policy of the country". Therefore, the Court concluded that the representation in the sphere of the foreign policy it is the duty of the constitutional institutions of the Republic of Kosovo. This competence is defined by the Constitution, and means, first of all, that any negotiation or other action related to the conclusion of international agreements on behalf of the Republic of Kosovo, must be within the constitutional obligations of the institutions of the Republic of Kosovo. The Court also concluded that the competence to reach international agreements cannot be carried over or transferred from the constitutional institutions to a "special mechanism" as provided by the challenged Law," is stressed in the judgement of the Constitutional Court. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/senet. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/01b401d52cf6%24a39c3cc0%24ead4b640%24%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
