thediplomat.com 
<https://thediplomat.com/2020/03/how-a-pandemic-drew-china-and-serbia-closer/>  


How a Pandemic Drew China and Serbia Closer


Eleanor Albert

7-9 minutes

  _____  


China Power <https://thediplomat.com/category/china-power/>  | Diplomacy 
<https://thediplomat.com/topics/diplomacy/>  | East Asia 
<https://thediplomat.com/regions/east-asia/>  


China’s medical assistance to Serbia inspired profuse gratitude from President 
Vucic.



Credit: Twitter/ President of the Republic of Serbia 
<https://twitter.com/predsednikrs/status/1242167505176715270?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Eprofile%3Apredsednikrs%7Ctwcon%5Etimelinechrome&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.predsednik.rs%2Fen>
 

The global spread of the coronavirus reveals the need for medical and economic 
responses, and yet, the pandemic has also created opportunities for diplomatic 
jockeying. While the downward spiral in U.S.-China relations has garnered 
significant coverage, less attention has been directed to China’s efforts to 
assist smaller countries around the world – those who currently are facing 
lower numbers of confirmed coronavirus cases, but have less crisis capacity. 
Recent Chinese aid to Serbia highlights not only how Beijing is capitalizing on 
the pandemic to rewrite its image as a responsible international actor, but 
also a steady deepening of ties between Beijing and Belgrade.

China-Serbia relations have gone through various permutations, influenced both 
by changes in the international environment and in their respective domestic 
political arenas. In the past decade or so, China-Serbia ties have grown 
stronger 
<https://thediplomat.com/2019/01/serbia-chinas-open-door-to-the-balkans/> . In 
2009, the two countries signed an agreement establishing a strategic 
partnership 
<https://web.archive.org/web/20090822081808/http:/www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2009&mm=08&dd=20&nav_id=61263>
 . This partnership was upgraded <http://www.knsrk.gov.rs/eng/a0090.php>  to a 
comprehensive strategic partnership in 2016. A year later, China and Serbia 
lifted visa restrictions for travelers to the two countries. Since then, the 
two countries have signed on to a series of major projects that extend China’s 
Belt and Road Initiative to the western Balkans, including a Belgrade-Budapest 
railway and a new metro system for the Serbian capital. Separately, the growth 
in Chinese influence 
<https://warontherocks.com/2019/09/light-touch-tight-grip-chinas-influence-and-the-corrosion-of-serbian-democracy/>
  in Serbia is also felt both through cultural and political channels, as well 
as via the installation of Huawei Safe City technology 
<https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/06/18/big-brother-comes-to-belgrade-huawei-china-facial-recognition-vucic/>
  for surveillance.

On the economic front, bilateral trade has grown significantly, tripling 
between 2005 and 2016, though the relationship is very unbalanced. In 2018, 
China ranked third among the top sources of Serbian imported goods, behind 
Germany and Italy.

Meanwhile, Serbia remains engaged in negotiations for accession to the European 
Union. Its accession has been on the EU’s expansion agenda since 2011 and 
negotiations are expected to be completed by 2023, though the future path is 
uncertain. The coronavirus outbreak appears to be exacerbating tension between 
Serbia’s ruling party and the EU, potentially delaying progress on improving 
with its neighbors.

In mid-March, Serbian President Aleksander Vucic initially declared a state of 
emergency 
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-serbia/serbia-calls-state-of-emergency-to-counter-coronavirus-idUSKBN21215E>
  to stem the spread of the virus, announcing a night curfew and the deployment 
of the military 
<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-serbia-border/serbias-military-deploys-at-borders-to-help-fight-coronavirus-idUSKBN2153G2>
  to protect hospitals and Serbian borders, among other measures. (As of March 
26, Serbia had nearly 400 confirmed cases 
<https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html>  of the virus, according to the Johns 
Hopkins University & Medicine Coronavirus Resource Center.) Vucic also made 
appeals for international assistance in combating the virus. China heeded the 
call by sending much-needed testing kits and a medical team, including 
epidemiologists with COVID-19 experience. Separately, Chen Bo, the Chinese 
ambassador to Serbia, joined many of China’s other diplomats in opening a 
Twitter account <https://twitter.com/AmbChenBo>  earlier this month and has to 
date focused on disseminating information about China’s solidarity with Serbia 
and medical help.

Following the arrival of the Chinese doctors, Vucic revised Serbia’s response 
<https://vucic.rs/Vesti/Najnovije/a37366-Vucic-o-masovnom-testiranju-vreme-da-krenemo-u-ofanzivu-vucic.rs.html>
  to follow what could be described as a “Chinese model.” Serbia will now 
implement a mass testing program 
<https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202003/24/WS5e796b41a3101282172817dd.html>  
and immediately isolate positive cases, with mild ones in makeshift clinics, 
serious cases in hospitals, and severe cases treated in intensive care units. 
Failure to abide by social distancing guidelines, including a curfew, will be 
punishable by three to 12 years in jail.

Other countries and organizations have provided aid to Serbia, albeit to much 
less fanfare. Norway sent 5 million euros in economic assistance. UNICEF 
donated dozens of ventilators, protective gear, and sanitizing supplies. On 
March 25, the European Union announced a 93 million euro package for Serbia, 
including 15 million euros for the purchase and transport of medical supplies 
and equipment and an additional 78 million euros for economic recovery.

Still, Chinese state media have made the most of the Vucic’s administration’s 
appreciation for Chinese aid and frustration with the EU’s responsiveness and 
lack of European solidarity. For example, Vucic welcomed the arrival of China’s 
medical team and publicly made the following statement: “Dear Chinese friends, 
sisters and brothers, welcome to Serbia!  Thank you very much to my brother, 
President Xi Jinping, the Communist Party of China and the Chinese people. Long 
live our steel friendship! 
<https://twitter.com/avucic/status/1241450408217923585>  Long live China! Long 
live Serbia!” Videos of the Serbian president praising China 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GR-LJaGl9XU>  and kissing the Chinese flags 
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=om7UImD-hmE>  have also been shared widely on 
Chinese state-owned media.

News outlets such as Xinhua and China Daily feature headlines emphasizing 
China’s goodwill: “Chinese aid hailed as nations reel,” “As China recovers from 
COVID-19 blow, Chinese rush to Europe’s rescue,” “China offers anti-virus 
assistance to 89 countries,” and “Xi says China to contribute to a stable world 
economy.” These examples illustrate a large trend in Chinese state media, which 
are moving to better promote China as a great power. Neil Thomas, a senior 
researcher at the Paulson Institute’s MacroPolo, tracked the mentions of 
“assuming the role of a great power” 
<https://twitter.com/neilthomas123/status/1242855370529411073?s=20>  (大国担当) in 
the People’s Daily and found that the phrase has taken off under Xi Jinping’s 
leadership and has surged in the first quarter of 2020.

Repairing China’s domestic and international reputation in the aftermath of its 
own fight against the coronavirus is no doubt the primary motivation driving 
the propaganda and foreign assistance push. This is not the first instance of 
China participating in response to global crises — it has previously been 
involved in multilateral approaches to the 2008 financial crisis and the 2015 
Ebola outbreak — but some have suggested that China’s coronavirus pandemic 
response is missing the multilateral tone 
<https://www.ft.com/content/efdec278-6d01-11ea-9bca-bf503995cd6f>  that 
characterized previous crises. Instead, China is pursuing a response as a lone, 
responsible actor.

Others argue that Beijing’s propaganda push and swift inroads in Europe during 
a crisis may backfire. “If Beijing is widely perceived to take advantage of 
Europe at a time of economic despair, any positive momentum it acquired in an 
early charm offensive could very quickly turn against it,” write the European 
Council on Foreign Relations’ Majda Ruge and Janka Oertel. They add that 
“Serbia’s most important relationship will be that with Europe – and no amount 
of propaganda will change that.”

Subscribe Now <https://thediplomat.com/subscriptions>  

Already a subscriber? Login here

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/003701d6041d%24d4539b20%247cfad160%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to