nytimes.com 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/22/world/europe/serbia-election-vucic.html>  

Serbia’s Strongman Wins Big in Election Boycotted by the Opposition

By Patrick Kingsley

5-7 minutes

  _____  

Opposition leaders said Serbia’s parliamentary elections lacked legitimacy. But 
they could allow for greater momentum in peace talks with Kosovo.

 

Credit...Aleksandar Dimitrijevic/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

BERLIN — President Aleksandar Vucic’s nearly complete control over the Serbian 
state was bolstered on Sunday after his party won a landslide victory in 
parliamentary elections boycotted by most of the opposition in protest at his 
autocratic policies.

Mr. Vucic was not personally up for re-election, but his political coalition, 
the nationalist Serbian Progressive Party, was projected to win more than 60 
percent of seats in Parliament, according to initial results.

This puts the party on the threshold of a “supermajority,” which, if secured, 
would allow its lawmakers to change the constitution without the support of any 
other political faction.

The result could also give Mr. Vucic greater leeway to forge a peace agreement 
with Kosovo 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/20/world/europe/serbia-kosovo-peace-elections.html>
 , the former Serbian province that broke from Belgrade in 1999, helped by an 
American-led bombing campaign, but whose sovereignty Serbia has never 
officially recognized.

The vote cemented Serbia’s move, under Mr. Vucic, away from a pluralist 
political culture. Since Mr. Vucic won the presidency in 2017, the quality of 
Serbian democracy has fallen from “free” to only “partly free,” according to 
Freedom House <https://freedomhouse.org/country/serbia/freedom-world/2020> , an 
independent Washington-based rights research group that makes an annual 
assessment of each country’s political freedoms.

Rights observers regularly express concern over the influence Mr. Vucic wields 
over the judiciary, the electoral process, and both state and private media.

A former minister under Slobodan Milosevic 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/12/world/europe/slobodan-milosevic-64-former-yugoslav-leader-accused-of-war.html>
 , the Serbian leader during the Kosovo War, Mr. Vucic said Sunday’s results 
were “absolutely incredible.”

“I’ve been in politics for a long time,” he said in a news conference after 
polls closed. “But I’ve never experienced anything like this.”

Election monitors from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in 
Europe, an intergovernmental body funded by 57 mainly European member states, 
said that the election had been administered efficiently but that the 
“dominance of the ruling party, including in the media, was of concern.”

Tthe main opposition parties called the election illegitimate, noting that 
initial projections suggested that turnout was one of the lowest in Serbia this 
century. With most votes counted, the electoral authority said just over 50 
percent of voters took part, while other monitors said less than half 
participated.

At a news conference on Sunday night, opposition leaders argued that turnout 
would have been even lower if Mr. Vucic’s party hadn’t intimidated thousands of 
people to vote in the final hours of polling on Sunday, or if the Serbian 
public broadcaster had run a more balanced program during the campaign.

 

Image

 

Credit...Andrej Isakovic/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

“Serbia unequivocally said ‘no’ to Aleksandar Vucic,” said Dragan Djilas, the 
leader of an alliance of seven opposition parties that boycotted the ballot, 
and encouraged their supporters to abstain from voting.

While the results give Mr. Vucic yet more power at home, analysts said they 
also put him under greater pressure internationally — because foreign leaders 
may now expect him to wield that power in their favor.

In recent years, Mr. Vucic has successfully curried support from competing 
global powers 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/31/world/europe/serbia-protests.html>  — 
maintaining a strong relationship with Russia and strengthening ties with 
China, while still positioning Serbia as a potential member of the European 
Union, and an interlocutor for the United States.

Mr. Vucic has said he has no intention of choosing between rival global powers 
and has, for the most part, successfully managed to navigate between outside 
interests.

But with the election passed and won, he faces immediate international pressure 
— particularly over the issue of Kosovo.

On Monday, he met with a senior envoy from the European Union, Miroslav Lajcak, 
to discuss a European-led initiative to forge a settlement with Kosovo.

On Saturday, he will meet at the White House with President Trump and his 
Balkan envoy, Richard Grenell, to discuss a rival, American-led initiative for 
a Serbia-Kosovo peace deal 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/20/world/europe/serbia-kosovo-peace-elections.html>
 .

And in between, Mr. Vucic will fly to Moscow to meet President Vladimir V. 
Putin of Russia, who has historically said that any deal with Kosovo must have 
the approval of the United Nations Security Council, where Russia occupies a 
permanent seat.

“What he does next is going to be very interesting,” said Marko Savkovic, 
program director for the Belgrade Security Forum, an annual politics conference 
in Serbia. “It’s going to be very hard for him to keep doing what he’s been 
doing for the last couple of years.”

Mr. Savkovic added: “He’s going to be asked by more and more people: Are you 
going to take this country, that you’re now fully in control of, closer to the 
West? Or are you going to be just another Balkan autocrat?”

On Monday evening, Mr. Vucic continued to defy expectations about his foreign 
policy.

Having previously signaled his readiness to negotiate with Kosovo in a process 
led by Mr. Grenell and the Trump administration, Mr. Vucic told reporters on 
Monday that he would now prefer to work within the framework of an EU-led 
process.

“While I appreciate the efforts of Richard Grenell to find economic solutions 
between us and Pristina,” Mr. Vucic said, “we are completely committed to the 
EU-led political dialogue.”




https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/22/world/europe/serbia-election-vucic.html

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/09e101d64941%2400365170%2400a2f450%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to