strategic-culture.org 
<https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/08/03/the-dollar-standard-slipping-out-of-control/>
  


The Dollar Standard Slipping Out of Control?


Alastair Crooke

11-13 minutes

  _____  

As commentators focus on the hospitalisations of two Gulf monarchs, and 
permutate likely succession issues, they may miss the wood for the succession 
trees: Of course, the death of either the Emir of Kuwait (91 years old) or King 
Salman of Saudi Arabia (84 years old) is a serious political matter. King 
Salman’s particularly has the potential to upturn the region (or not). Yet Gulf 
stability today rests less on who succeeds, but rather on tectonic shifts in 
geo-finance and politics that are just becoming visible. Time to move on from 
stale ruminations about who’s ‘up and coming’, and who’s ‘down and out’ in 
these dysfunctional families.

The stark fact is that Gulf stability rests on selling enough energy to buy-off 
internal discontents, and to pay for supersized surveillance and security 
set-ups.

For the moment, times are hard, but the States’ financial ‘cushions’ are just 
about holding-up (albeit only for the big three: Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi and 
Qatar). For others the situation is dire. The question is, will this present 
status quo persist? This is where the warnings of shifts in certain global 
tectonic plates becomes salient.

The Kuwaiti succession struggle is emblematic of the Gulf rift: One candidate 
for Emir, (the brother), stands with Saudi Arabia and its Wahhabi-led ‘war’ on 
Sunni Islamists (the Muslim Brotherhood). Whereas the other, (the eldest son), 
is actively backed by the Muslim Brotherhood, Qatar and Turkey. Thus, Kuwait 
sits on firmly on the Gulf abyss – a region with significant, but disempowered 
Shi’a minorities, and a Sunni camp divided and ‘at war’ with itself over 
support for the Muslim Brotherhood; or what is (politely called) ‘autocratic 
secular stability’.

Interesting though this is, is this really still so relevant?

The Gulf, perhaps more significantly, is held hostage to two huge financial 
bubbles. The real risk to these States may prove to come from these bubbles, 
which are the very devil to prick-down into any gentle, expelling of gas. They 
are sustained by mass psychology – which can pivot on a dime – and usually end 
catastrophically in a market ‘tantrum’, or a ‘bust’ – and with consequent risk 
of depression, should Central Banks ever try to lift the foot off the monetary 
accelerator.

The U.S. ubiquitous ‘asset bubble’ is famous. Central Bankers have been 
worrying about it for years. And the Fed is throwing money at it – with abandon 
– to keep it from popping. But as indicated earlier, such bubbles are highly 
vulnerable to psychology – and that may be turning, as the celebrated V-shaped, 
expected economic recovery recedes into the virus-induced distance. But for 
now, investors believe that the Fed daren’t let it implode – that the Fed has 
absolutely no option but go on throwing more and more money at it (at least 
until November elections … & then what?).

Less visible is that other vast ‘asset bubble’: The Chinese domestic property 
market. With its closed capital account, China has a huge sum (some $40 
trillion) sloshing around in collective bank accounts. That money can’t go 
abroad (at least legally), so it rotates around between three asset markets: 
apartments, stocks, and commodities somewhat whimsically. But investing in 
apartments is absolutely king! 96% of urban Chinese 
<https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/look-inside-52-trillion-bubble-has-hijacked-chinas-economy>
  own more than one: 75% of private wealth is represented by investments in 
condos – albeit with 21% standing empty in urban China, for lack of a tenant.

Long story, short, the Chinese massively chase property valuations. Indeed, as 
the WSJ has noted 
<https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-property-real-estate-boom-covid-pandemic-bubble-11594908517>
  “the central problem in China is that buyers have figured out the government 
doesn’t appear to be willing to let the market fall. If home prices did drop 
significantly, it would wipe out most citizens’ primary source of wealth, and 
potentially trigger unrest”. Even during the pandemic – or, perhaps because of 
it as the Chinese piled-in – prices rose 4.9% in June, year on year. The total 
value 
<https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/look-inside-52-trillion-bubble-has-hijacked-chinas-economy>
  of Chinese homes and developers’ inventory hit $52 trillion in 2019, 
according to Goldman Sachs; i.e. twice the size of the U.S. residential market, 
and outstripping even the entire U.S. bond market.

If it sounds just like America’s QE-inflated asset markets, that’s because it 
is. As things stand, both the Chinese residential and the U.S. equity bubbles 
are unstable. Which might fracture fist? Who knows … but bubbles are also 
vulnerable to pop on geo-political events (such as a U.S. naval landing on one 
of China’s disputed South Sea islands, to which China is promising 
<https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/state-newspaper-warns-china-will-definitely-retaliate-if-trump-stages-october-surprise>
 , absolutely, a military response).

No one has any idea how Chinese officials can manage the property bubble, 
without destabilizing the broader economy. And even should the market stay 
strong, it creates headaches for policy makers, who have had to hold off on 
more aggressive economic stimulus this year – which some analysts say is 
needed, partly because of fears it will inflate 
<https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/look-inside-52-trillion-bubble-has-hijacked-chinas-economy>
  housing further.

Ah … there it is: Out in plain view – the risk. The condo-trade has hijacked 
the entire Chinese economy, tying officials’ hands. This, at the moment when 
Trump’s trade war has turned into a new ideological cold war targeting the 
Chinese Communist Party. What if the Chinese economy, under further U.S. 
sanctions, slides further, or if Covid 19 resurges (as it is in Hong Kong)? 
Will then the housing market break, causing recession or depression? It is, 
after all, China and Asia that buy the bulk of Gulf energy: Demand shrinks, and 
price falls. The fate of the Gulf States’ economies – and stability – is tied 
to these mega-bubbles not popping.

Bubbles are one factor, but there are also signs of the tectonic plates 
drifting apart in a different way, but no less threatening. Bankers Goldman 
Sachs sits at the very heart of the western financial system – and incidentally 
staffs much of Team Trump, as well as the Federal Reserve.

And Goldman wrote something this week that one might not expect from such a 
system stalwart: Its commodity strategist Jeffrey Currie, wrote that  
<https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/goldman-warns-real-concerns-are-emerging-about-dollar-reserve-currency-goes-all-gold>
 “real concerns around the longevity of the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency 
have started to emerge”.

What? Goldman says the dollar might lose its reserve currency status. 
Unthinkable? Well that would be the standard view. Dollar hegemony and 
sanctions have long been seen as Washington’s stranglehold on the world through 
which to preserve U.S. primacy. America’s ‘hidden war’, as it were. Trump 
clearly views the dollar as the bludgeon that can make America Great Again. 
Furthermore, as Trump and Mnuchin – and now Congress – have taken control of 
the Treasury arsenal, the roll-out of new sanctions bludgeoning has turned into 
a deluge.

But there has also been within certain U.S. circles, a contrarian view. Which 
is that the U.S. needs to ‘re-boot’ its economic model with a Tech-led, 
‘supply-side’ miracle to end growth stagnation. Too much debt suffocates an 
economy, and populates it with zombie enterprises.

In 2014, Jared Bernstein, Obama’s former chief economist said that the U.S. 
Dollar must lose its reserve status 
<https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/28/opinion/dethrone-king-dollar.html?referrer=&_r=2>
 , if such a re-boot were to be done. He explained why, in a New York Times 
op-ed:

“There are few truisms about the world economy, but for decades, one has been 
the role of the United States dollar as the world’s reserve currency. It’s a 
core principle of American economic policy. After all, who wouldn’t want their 
currency to be the one that foreign banks and governments want to hold in 
reserve?

“But new research reveals that what was once a privilege is now a burden, 
undermining job growth, pumping up budget and trade deficits and inflating 
financial bubbles. To get the American economy on track, the government needs 
to drop its commitment to maintaining the dollar’s reserve-currency status.”

In essence, this is the Davos Great Reset  
<https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/27/the-fork-in-the-road/> line 
<https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/07/27/the-fork-in-the-road/> . 
Christine Lagarde, in the same year, called too for a ‘reset’ (or re-boot) of 
monetary policy (in the face of “bubbles growing here and there) – and to deal 
with stagnant growth and unemployment. And this week, the U.S. Council on 
Foreign Relations issued a paper entitled: It is Time to Abandon Dollar 
Hegemony 
<https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/americas/2020-07-28/it-time-abandon-dollar-hegemony>
 .

That, we repeat, is the globalist line. The CFR has been a progenitor of both 
the European and Davos projects. It is not Trump’s. He is fighting to keep 
America as the seat of western power, and not to accede that role to Merkel’s 
European project – or to China.

So why would Goldman Sachs say such a thing? Attend carefully to Goldman’s 
framing: It is not the Davos line. Instead, Currie writes that the soaring 
disconnect between spiking gold price and a weakening dollar “is being driven 
by a potential shift in the U.S. Fed towards an inflationary bias, against a 
backdrop of rising geopolitical tensions, elevated U.S. domestic political and 
social uncertainty, and a growing second wave of covid-19 related infections”.

Translation: It is about U.S. explosive debt accumulation, on account of the 
Coronavirus lockdown. In a world where there is already over $100 trillion in 
dollar-denominated debt, on which the U.S. cannot default; nor will it ever be 
repaid. It can therefore only be inflated away. That is to say the debt can 
only be managed through debasing the currency. (Debt jubilees are viewed as 
beyond the pale.)

That is to say, Goldman’s man says dollar debasement is firmly on the Fed 
agenda. And that means that “real concerns around the longevity of the U.S. 
dollar as a reserve currency, have started to emerge”.

It is a nuanced message: It hints that the monetary experiment, which began in 
1971, is ending. Currie is telling U.S. that the U.S. is no longer able to 
manage an economy with this much debt – simply by printing new currency, and 
with its hands tied on other options. The debt situation already is 
unprecedented – and the pandemic is accelerating the process.

In short, things are starting to spin out of control, which is not the same as 
advocating a re-boot. And the debasement of money is inevitable. That’s why 
Currie points to the disconnect between the gold price (which usually 
governments like to repress), and a weakening dollar. If it is out of the Fed’s 
control, it is ultimately (post-November) out of Trump’s hands, too.

Should confidence in the dollar begin to evaporate, all fiat currencies will 
sink in tandem – as G20 Central Banks are bound by the same policies as the 
U.S.. China’s situation is complicated. It would in one way be harmed by dollar 
debasement, but in another way, a general debasement of fiat currency would 
offer China and Russia the crisis (i.e. the opportunity), to escape the 
dollar’s knee pressed onto their throats.

And for Gulf States? The slump in oil prices this year already has prompted 
some investors to bet against Gulf nations’ currencies, putting longstanding 
currency pegs with the dollar under pressure. GCC states have kept their 
currencies glued to the dollar since the 1970s, but low oil demand, combined 
with dollar weakness would exacerbate the threat to Gulf ‘pegs’, as their trade 
deficits blow out. Were a peg to break, it is not clear there would be any 
obvious floor to that currency, in present circumstances.

Against such a backdrop, the royal successions underway in Gulf States might 
perhaps be regarded a sideshow.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/01d301d66d6b%2424939bb0%246dbad310%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to