blogs.lse.ac.uk 
<https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2020/12/02/lukashenko-putin-and-the-protests-why-belarus-is-being-pulled-further-into-russias-orbit/>
  


Lukashenko, Putin and the protests: Why Belarus is being pulled further into 
Russia’s orbit


Oleg Chupryna

5-7 minutes

  _____  

For almost four months, protesters have taken to the streets of Belarus 
demanding the resignation of President Alexander Lukashenko. Oleg Chupryna 
argues that with Lukashenko increasingly reliant on Vladimir Putin’s support, 
there is a risk Belarus could be pulled further under the influence of Russia.

Belarus has witnessed months of protests against President Alexander 
Lukashenko, following presidential elections on 9 August which are widely 
perceived to have suffered from electoral fraud. Lukashenko, who has been in 
power for 26 years, is often dubbed by western media as ‘Europe’s last 
dictator’. But on this occasion, his heavy-handed response to the protests has 
largely had the opposite effect of that intended.

Thousands of people continue to protest on a daily basis, while at weekends 
their numbers amount to the hundreds of thousands. The main demands are the 
resignation of Lukashenko, the release of all political prisoners and 
unlawfully arrested protesters, and new, free and fair elections to be observed 
by the international community.

The reaction to these events from outside Belarus has been typically varied. 
Russia, China and some other autocracies rushed to immediately recognise the 
results of the elections. Western democracies, including the US and the EU, did 
not recognise the results, have condemned the repression of protesters, and 
have imposed sanctions against the officials responsible for them. They have 
also called on the regime to negotiate with the opposition and pushed for new 
elections.

Despite this, Lukashenko shows no signs of giving in to the demands or 
negotiating a compromise. Leaders of the opposition’s Coordination Council have 
been arrested or expelled from Belarus. Meanwhile, the regime’s propaganda 
machine has taken aim at the West for attempting to ‘destroy and capture the 
country’. At this point, it is impossible to predict where Belarus is headed, 
with neither the regime nor the people willing to give up. On 27 November, 
Lukashenko indicated that he may be willing to step down 
<https://www.ft.com/content/9d5b554f-11d5-423b-848f-7b6cd9cd6a41>  once a new 
constitution is established, but there is no timeline for when this might be.

At the same time, the economic situation in the country is becoming 
increasingly difficult. Since the start of 2020, the Belarusian economy has 
entered into a sharp decline. By September, the state coffers were almost 
empty. With debt repayments to foreign creditors due and security staff needing 
to be paid to remain loyal to the regime, Lukashenko requested assistance from 
Russia in mid-September and secured a loan worth 1.5 billion dollars. Vladimir 
Putin also confirmed <https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53930796>  that 
Russia would provide a helping hand, including through the provision of some 
Russian police forces should they be needed.




Alexander Lukashenko with Vladimir Putin in June 2019, Credit: kremlin.ru


It is notable that very little information has been released by both 
governments regarding the almost five-hour meeting between Putin and 
Lukashenko, which took place behind closed doors in Sochi. It is an open 
question as to what Lukashenko was asked to offer in return for support. Given 
the high level of dependence Belarus has on Russia in economic terms, and the 
history of close relations between the two countries, some might wonder whether 
the price may effectively be Belarussian independence itself.

In the mid-1990s, Lukashenko proposed the idea of a ‘Union State’ between 
Belarus and Russia. An agreement to this effect was signed in 1999. It has been 
suggested that Lukashenko’s ultimate aspiration was to become the President of 
a shared state, given Boris Yeltsin, his Russian counterpart, was suffering 
from ill health at the time. In the end, the rise of Putin as Yeltsin’s 
successor put pay to these ambitions. Lukashenko, unwilling to play a secondary 
role, quickly lost interest in the union.

For two decades, Putin and Lukashenko have now been firm ‘frenemies’. Belarus 
has acquired substantial economic benefits from Russia, notably subsidised, 
below-market prices for oil and natural gas imports. Meanwhile, Putin has aimed 
to keep Belarus within Russia’s orbit. In the current situation, however, 
Lukashenko faces a choice between losing power completely or increasing his 
reliance on Russia, with the potential costs for Belarussian independence that 
might come with the bargain.

Despite the close historic and cultural ties between the two countries, few 
people in Belarus support the idea of joining Russia. For the Kremlin, the 
situation is increasingly tricky as providing full support to Lukashenko, 
against the wishes of many Belarussian citizens, risks raising anti-Russian 
sentiment. Putin cannot allow the people of Belarus to overthrow their 
autocratic leader, not least because this would provide an unwanted example for 
his own citizens. Yet on the other hand, direct involvement in the suppression 
of protests could have a devastating effect on public opinion toward Russia.

Given this context, perhaps the most attractive option for Putin is to make use 
of indirect, hybrid methods to bring an end to the protests and bring Belarus 
more closely under Russia’s influence. This scenario is one that Lukashenko’s 
opponents in Belarus and their friends in the West should be acutely aware of.

  _____  

Note: This article gives the views of the author, not the position of EUROPP – 
European Politics and Policy or the London School of Economics. Featured image 
credit: kremlin.ru 
<http://kremlin.ru/events/president/trips/60868/photos/59860> 

  _____  

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/01a601d6c89a%24b6668860%2423339920%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to