biznesalert.com 
<https://biznesalert.com/how-russia-and-the-balkans-tricked-the-ec-and-built-the-turkish-stream/>
  


How Russia and the Balkans tricked the EC and built the Turkish Stream - 
BiznesAlert EN


COMMENTS: Bartłomiej Sawicki

8-10 minutes

  _____  

Russia, Bulgaria and Serbia demonstrated how to bypass the EU law to build gas 
pipelines, which de facto strengthen Russia’s monopolistic grip on Southeastern 
Europe. The European leg of the Turkish Stream was called the Balkan Stream to 
mask the endeavor’s true origins. This is the second incarnation of the South 
Stream gas pipeline, which together with Nord Stream 1 and 2 is set to free 
Gazprom from its reliance on Ukraine. The Russian giant sidestepped the third 
energy package thanks to a handshake deal with the Balkan states. This 
situation offers a peak into how Russia will want to bypass the updated gas 
directive – Bartłomiej Sawicki, editor at BiznesAlert.pl, writes.


Serbia is vocal and Bulgaria is absent


On the 1st of January, Serbia’s President Aleksandar Vučić opened the Serbian 
section of the European leg of the Turkish Stream in the town of Gospodjinci 
near Novy Sad. He said that natural gas from Russia was already being delivered 
to Serbia via a pipeline that went through Turkey and Bulgaria. The pipe is 403 
km long and its capacity will be almost 14 bcm a year. Vučić also revealed that 
1000 cm of gas will cost USD 155 plus another USD 12-14 for transmission. The 
Turkish Stream’s capacity is 15.75 bcm, but the majority of gas will stay in 
Turkey. The end goal is to transfer 31.5 bcm annually of Russian natural gas to 
Turkey’s western provinces. Half of that amount will be exported further to the 
Balkans and Central Europe, including Bulgaria, Serbia and Hungary.
“Today marks exactly one year since the TurkStream offshore gas pipeline was 
launched in a grand opening ceremony. The pipeline is reliably transmitting 
Russian gas across the Black Sea for consumers in Turkey and as many as six 
European countries: Bulgaria, Greece, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, and 
Bosnia and Herzegovina. Since bringing TurkStream into operation, Gazprom has 
increased the gas pipeline’s utilization rate by 2.2 times, including a 
2.5-fold growth in utilization for European consumers,” Gazprom CEO Alexey 
Miller said on the 8th of January. Miller also pointed out that Turkey, Greece 
and Northern Macedonia bought more gas from Gazprom in 2020.

The TurkStream runs under the Black Sea from Russia to Turkey and was opened in 
January 2020. The deadline for completing its extension via Bulgaria, dubbed by 
Bulgaria’s Prime Minister Boyko Borisov the “Balkan Stream” passed on the 15th 
of December. A day later, the CEO of the national gas operator Bulgartransgaz, 
Vladimir Malinov confirmed the construction had been finished. No official 
opening was held.

The natural gas pipeline is to deliver Russian gas to Central and Eastern 
Europe bypassing Ukraine. The United States announced it would impose sanctions 
against companies helping to implement the Turkish Stream and Nord Stream 2. 
After the U.S. Senate overrode the outgoing president’s veto, the sanctions 
entered into force and companies that are taking part in those projects have to 
withdraw their participation by the end of January. Washington believes both 
projects are geopolitical tools used by the Kremlin to make Europe dependant on 
Russian gas.


Bulgaria – the quiet one


After the celebration, Serbia came into the spotlight across Europe, even 
though it should have been Bulgaria. While Serbia is indeed a member of the 
European Energy Community where EU regulations are in force, including those 
pertaining to gas, contrary to Bulgaria it is not an EU member. Even though the 
implementation of the project was mired with technical issues and 
misunderstandings with Russia, Sofia completed it quietly and without much fuss.

In Bulgaria the main contractor was a Saudi company Arkad, which is run by 
Russians who bought pipes produced in Russia from Russian companies. Over 90 
percent of the pipeline’s capacity has been already booked for the next 20 
years by companies owned by Gazprom and the Swiss company MET. This information 
was revealed by Bulgartransgaz, Bulgaria’s gas transmission network operator in 
early 2020.

At the beginning of the year, Boyko Borisov announced the Bulgarian section of 
the Turkish Stream would be opened after a system interconnection between the 
Bulgarian transmission network and a Greek LNG terminal Alexandroupolis is 
launched. This is a separate project whose goal is to diversify natural gas 
sources, and which has American backing.
“Once everything is ready, I will invite neighbors, all friends will come, 
because what Bulgaria did, made it possible to achieve full diversification and 
allows our neighbors get transit fees,” Borisov said in a quote on the Free 
Europe portal. However, it did not stop him a day earlier from visiting a 
compressor station in the town of Petrich, which started to transport gas from 
Azerbeijan from Turkey to Europe. According to the deal signed by 
Bulgargtransgaz with Azerbeijan’s SOCAR oil tycoon, Bulgaria will receive 1 bcm 
of gas annually for 25 years. It looks like the European Commission failed to 
notice this attempt at bypassing the EU law. However, the US did pay attention 
and is threatening with sanctions against companies that are engaged in the 
construction of the Balkan Stream. This may explain Bulgaria’s reticence.


Gazprom sidestepped the EC


However, according to EurActiv, Gazprom skilfully bypassed the EU third energy 
package, which seven years ago stood in the way to build South Stream, the 
predecessor of the Turkish Stream. Moreover, the portal argues that the EU 
states actually paid for it. This may explain Bulgaria’s reticence. “Under the 
nose of the European Commission, Gazprom has taken over the most important 
border points of Bulgarian transit pipelines, without having to pay billions of 
euros for their construction and without owning the pipes – circumventing EU 
rules under the Third Energy Package,” the portal argues. In other words, 
Russia and the Balkan states reached a gentlemen’s agreement. In contrast to 
the South Stream, Gazprom did not formally engage in the construction of the 
Turkish Stream’s extensions in Europe. The investments were made by the states 
themselves, including Bulgaria and Serbia, which formally did not call the 
endeavor a transit gas pipeline, but an expansion of their internal transit 
network. In return Gazprom booked as part of long-term agreements capacities, 
which guaranteed a return on investment thanks to transit fees. Therefore, an 
unwritten deal based on mutual trust passed under the nose of the European 
Commission.

Gazprom has already booked all the key exits of the gas pipeline from Bulgaria 
in the strategic southern direction to Turkey, Greece and Northern Macedonia, 
as well as to Serbia in the west. Gazprom has also met the requirement of the 
third energy package to book up to 50 percent of the available capacity. The 
capacity is booked at over 90 percent for Gazprom and the Swiss-based MET 
company, in which the majority of shares is owned by the Russian giant, on the 
basis of a long-term contract that will be binding until 2039. So formally, 
everything is in line with the EU law. However, the truth is it doesn’t 
actually matter, because the pipe does not have a physical connection to any 
other source apart from the one on shore of the Black Sea. No other player has 
physical access to that entry point. “Such conditions pave the way for Gazprom 
to take over the entire Bulgarian market. There is little chance that Prime 
Minister Boyko Borissov’s favourite project – the Balkan gas hub – will operate 
as a “European hub”, while all southbound gas routes to Turkey, Greece and 
Macedonia are blocked,” EurActiv writes.

  _____  

  _____  

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/025c01d6eb2d%2414d90170%243e8b0450%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to