euractiv.com
<https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/opinion/great-serbian-vaccinat
ionism/>  


Great Serbian vaccinationism


Orhan Dragaš

6-8 minutes

  _____  

The decision of the Serbian authorities to open the door to their neighbours
for vaccination has nothing to do with reviving warm memories of the former
Yugoslavia, writes Orhan Dragaš.

Dr Orhan Dragaš, International Security Institute of Belgrade, is author of
the book "Two Faces of Globalization- truth and deceptions".

People in the Balkans over 40 remember that it was common to travel from
Sarajevo or Skopje to Belgrade for Red Star's European matches or from
Belgrade to Zagreb for the Rolling Stones concert in 1976. The war and the
disintegration of the former state during the 1990s made whole generations
grow up believing that 300 or 400 kilometres to the neighbouring capital is
an unattainable distance, even when it comes to top entertainment.

Scenes of the neighbour's "invasion" from 30-40 years ago were repeated in
Belgrade last weekend, although the occasion was different. About 9,000
people from the region were vaccinated in just two days in Belgrade, as
Serbian authorities provided a free and easy registration procedure at their
health facilities, where vaccination has been carried out since December.

This invasion of people from the region for the vaccine in Belgrade was not
preceded by any promotional campaign. As one Sarajevo resident said, it was
enough for him to learn from a friend from Belgrade about the possibility of
vaccinating foreign citizens and to get on the road immediately, and in the
meantime, as he says, "the whole of Sarajevo" learned about this action. It
seems that most citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia and
Montenegro came to Belgrade for AstraZeneca, and according to media reports
and expressions of gratitude on social media, there were many vaccinated
people from Croatia and Slovenia. Let's not forget the nice crew of an
Albanian airline, which used the break between the two flights to swing for
the first shot of AstraZeneca.

The decision of the Serbian authorities to open the door to their neighbours
for vaccination has nothing to do with reviving warm memories of the former
Yugoslavia. Things are much more pragmatic. Everyone who arrived in Belgrade
from the region came only to protect themselves with the vaccine from
COVID-19 virus. Their motives are quite clear and understandable, but what
about Serbia's motives?

For months now, Serbia has been stable, close to the top in Europe and the
world in terms of the number of vaccinated citizens in proportion to its
population. At the end of March, the figures say that at least one quarter
of the population received a dose, and about 15% of the citizens were
revaccinated. Such figures allow Serbia the "luxury" of distributing certain
amounts of the vaccine to its closest neighbours, whose statistics were
catastrophically bad until just a few weeks ago. The Serbian president did
not pass without criticism in his country when he handed over 8,000 doses of
Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine to the Prime Minister of Northern Macedonia, Zoran
Zaev, in mid-February. Despite that, President Vučić and Prime Minister Ana
Brnabić repeated a similar action in Podgorica, then in Sarajevo, only to
continue, in a slightly different way, by opening vaccination points in
Belgrade for everyone from the region.

Analyzing Serbia's motives for doing this, in European circles dealing with
the Balkans, takes up incomparably more space than discussing the real
effects of this action, measured by the number of vaccinated people in
countries where it was zero until recently. In that endless dissection of
Serbian motives, one inevitably goes into exaggerations, even into pure
mistakes (intentional or not). The Center for Strategic and International
Studies (CSIS) is wrong, for example, when it states that "the donation of
Serbian President Vučić to Northern Macedonia was more symbolic than
substantive". It was more than a substantive, because 8,000 donated doses
from Serbia were enough to vaccinate all Macedonian doctors in primary
health care and almost half of all nurses and technicians! At the same time,
the help arrived at the right time, because until that moment, no citizen
was vaccinated in Northern Macedonia, not even a health worker. The same
kind of substantive support came to Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina,
also at a time when they did not have a single dose.

The motives of Serbia and its President Vučić to lead this regional campaign
are extremely pragmatic and no hidden agenda should be sought here. It is
true that Serbia and Vučić are gaining a positive image throughout the
Balkans with these moves, in an area that has failed to build tolerance and
mutual empathy for decades. But aren't all other leaders in the world who
have enough vaccines in their hands doing the same thing, and even the EU,
which does not have a good internal supply? What more can the recent
decision of European leaders on the mechanism for approving the export of
vaccines from the EU be than the effort to preserve international influence?
Nothing special or hidden, vaccines have become an instrument of
cross-border influence and it is a generally accepted and legitimate
practice around the world.

Furthermore, the regional vaccine-diplomacy conducted by Serbia has the
expected positive effect to increase the health performance of its immediate
environment, because these are the spaces and people with whom Serbia has
the busiest trade, personal communication, labour migration, students and
tourists. It is clear that it will not mean much to Serbia, being in the
European and world top of vaccinated nations, if its closest environment is
at the very bottom.

In essence, Serbia in the Balkans is doing nothing different from the way
the EU regulates its internal relations and regimes in the fight against the
pandemic. In that, it is guided exclusively by its own interests, and in
this case, it coincides with the interests of its neighbours.

Just as the European Union will not change its internal structure after the
pandemic, so the current political architecture will not be disrupted in the
Balkans either. There is no talk of a new Yugoslavia, which is often and
superficially discussed, and there will be no "Great Serbia". The best proof
of that is the ridicule of the story about "Great Serbian nationalism" even
while the regional vaccine weekend in Belgrade lasted, because witty and
grateful guests, upon their return from Belgrade, quickly coined the term
"Great Serbian vaccinationism".

 

-- 
http:www.antic.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/00d301d7286e%24e0fb2cf0%24a2f186d0%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to