dtt-net.com <https://dtt-net.com/opinion-the-balkans-are-coming-apart/>  


[Opinion] : The Balkans are coming apart


7–9 minutes

  _____  

–Bosnia faces the risk of secession

–Kosovo does too

–Montenegro has already fallen

By Daniel Serwer

Washington, 25 April 2023, dtt-net.com / peacefare.net 
<https://www.peacefare.net/>  – I’ve been too committed to book-writing to 
comment much lately, but the deteriorating situation in the Balkans prompts 
this post.

Bosnia faces the risk of secession

In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Serb member of the state presidency, Milorad 
Dodik, is reiterating 
<https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/bosnian-serb-leader-says-serb-entity-and-serbia-to-be-one-state/2879624>
  his intention to declare independence. He nominally seeks incorporation into 
Serbia. His current issue 
<https://www.rferl.org/a/dodik-succession-property-law-dispute-republika-srpska/32364275.html>
  is that the state judiciary won’t allow him to expropriate public land in 
Republika Srpska (RS), which he needs as collateral for the loans he will be 
refinancing from Russia and other dubious sources this summer.

But that contingency should not distract from the main objective. Dodik has 
long aimed to be free of the scrutiny that comes from both the state and the 
international community. His theft of RS resources and abuse of the funds 
Russia supplies make him vulnerable to prosecution.

Dodik needs to free himself from Bosnia and find a home where he won’t risk 
arrest. It is unlikely Serbia will open its doors, as that would offend 
Brussels and Washington too much. But Dodik will be content with an independent 
RS.

Kosovo does too

In Kosovo, the situation has gone from bad to worse 
<https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/north-kosovo-elections-trigger-harsh-words-criticisms-from-belgrade/>
 . Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has demonstrated in two ways that he 
controls the Serbs who live north of the Ibar River.

First, Sunday’s elections were peaceful. That could not have happened without 
his orders. Take it as confirmation that Belgrade ordered all the rioting there 
in the past.

Second, the overwhelming majority of Serbs did not vote. Vucic ordered that 
too. Those citizens who did vote elected four Albanians as mayors in 
Serb-majority municipalities. Vucic and his prime minister (Ana Brnabic) 
reacted with 
<https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/north-kosovo-elections-trigger-harsh-words-criticisms-from-belgrade/>
  the fury of ethnic nationalists offended that the minority decided the 
outcome, because of the boycott they ordered.

I wouldn’t want to be one of those mayors. They will get little or no 
cooperation from either local Serb officials or the majority populations. 
Vucic’s fury is intended to hide the fact that he will continue to de facto 
govern the four northern Serb-majority municipalities from Belgrade, using its 
network of security agents and organized criminals. Pristina will have a hard 
time getting anything done there.

Montenegro has already fallen

Vucic has already captured Montenegro. He has used savvy hybrid means with 
Russian support to elect a new president. Jakov Milatovic claims to be pro-EU 
but is more than affectionate towards Serbia.

The Serbian Church, pro-Serbian political parties, and populist mobilization 
against corruption combined to chase from office Milo Djukanovic. He had held 
power for most of the last three decades, governing with ethnic minority group 
support. Upcoming June 11 parliamentary elections will give Milatovic a deeply 
pro-Serb, anti-minority majority in parliament.

Montenegro is a NATO member. Serbia claims militarily “neutral” status. This 
should be enough to prevent any annexation, but it also weakens the Alliance, 
inserting in its midst another spoiler like Hungary.

No accident

It is no accident that parallel efforts at removing Serbs from non-Serb 
governing authority are occurring in three countries. President Vucic is 
pursuing the “Serbian world,” that is a state for all Serbs that incorporates 
territory that lies in neighboring countries. This is “Greater Serbia,” 
Milosevic’s goal, by another name.

In Bosnia, he needs only allow Dodik to do his thing.

In Kosovo, he is taking advantage of Prime Minister Albin Kurti’s reluctance to 
begin negotiations on a “self-management” mechanism for the Serbs in Kosovo.

In Montenegro, elections have delivered what Vucic wanted.

While the Americans and Europeans continue to avow that Serbia is embracing the 
West, in fact Vucic has turned his country definitively to the East.

For the “Serbian world” to become a reality, Belgrade needs to hope Russia will 
win in Ukraine. That would provide the precedent Vucic needs for annexing parts 
of Kosovo and Bosnia. He will also need China to provide the financing Greater 
Serbia will require. Montenegro he needn’t annex–just remarry to recreate the 
State Union of Serbia and Montenegro, which existed 2003-06. Or cohabitate with 
lots of bilateral agreements an inch short of amalgamation.

The weak-kneed Americans and Europeans

Vucic knows the Americans and Europeans won’t want to accept de jure a Greater 
Serbia. But he hopes they will learn to live with a de facto one. They in turn 
are proving soft. Washington has been trying to ignore Dodik and mollify Vucic. 
American diplomats vigorously advocate for the Association of Serb-majority 
Municipalities he sees as the vehicle for Serb “self-management.”

The Americans have also revivified military cooperation and provided lots of 
financing through multilateral European development banks. Complaints about 
corruption in Serbia are few and far between. This appeasement has gotten no 
positive results.

Splits handicap the Europeans. Hungarian Prime Minister Orban acts as a 
protector for both Vucic and Dodik, preventing sanctions against both.

France and the Netherlands have slowed enlargement prospects for Macedonia, 
Albania, and Bosnia. That diminishes the EU’s appeal also in Serbia and 
Montenegro.

The five EU member states (Cyprus, Greece, Romania, Slovakia and Spain) that 
have not recognized Kosovo  and prevent a real consensus in its favor, even in 
the relatively non-controversial vote this week at the Council of Europe to 
Pristina’s membership process.

A change of direction is needed

The US and EU are failing in the Balkans. They need to change direction. Their 
basic analysis is flawed. They have been relying on Serbia as the pivotal state 
in the region to bring stability, in cooperation with Croatia and Albania. But 
Serbia is a revisionist power. It wants to govern all Serbs in the region. 
Croatia and Albania have lesser ambitions, but in the same direction: to 
control their compatriots in neighboring Bosnia and Kosovo.

Washington and Brussels need a far more vigorous, united, and principled 
approach. That would support the rights of individual citizens, whatever their 
ethnicity. It would counter ethnic nationalism wherever it abuses minorities. 
It would reinforce the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all the 
region’s states. And it would welcome to the West only those who demonstrate 
real solidarity with the West.

—————————————————————————————————————————————–

Daniel Serwer is a Professor of the Practice of Conflict Management as well as 
director of the Conflict Management and American Foreign Policy Programs at the 
Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. This opinion of his was 
originally published at his peacefare.net <https://www.peacefare.net/>  
website.        

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author do not 
necessarily reflect the official policy or position of dtt-net.com  

Post Views: 120 

 

-- 
http:www.antic.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/016c01d97837%24c6333780%245299a680%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to