carnegieendowment.org 
<https://carnegieendowment.org/europe/strategic-europe/2024/09/dont-drop-the-ball-on-kosovo?lang=en&center=europe>
  


Don’t Drop the Ball on Kosovo


by Dimitar Bechev 
<https://carnegieendowment.org/people/dimitar-bechev?center=europe> 

Published on September 10, 2024

5–6 minutes

  _____  

The promise of EU membership was once the silver bullet for resolving all 
territorial and security issues in the Balkans. That is less and less the case 
these days. And there is no better proof than the continuing drama involving 
Kosovo and Serbia.

Back in March 2023, Kosovo’s Prime Minister Albin Kurti and Serbia’s President 
Aleksandar Vučić adopted—sort of—an EU-proposed roadmap, the Ohrid Agreement, 
toward settling the dispute around Kosovo’s status. But since then, the pretend 
deal has all but unraveled. What was supposed to be a major achievement for the 
outgoing EU foreign policy supremo Josep Borrell may turn into a major headache 
for his successor.

Diplomats and policymakers in Brussels and Washington fault one person: Kurti. 
The combative prime minister has taken a great deal of criticism for clamping 
down 
<https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/31/protest-from-us-after-kosovo-closes-serbian-offices>
  on parallel institutions operating in Serb-populated northern Kosovo. This 
includes the closure of four municipalities 
<https://balkaninsight.com/2024/09/02/kosovo-serbs-protest-closure-of-serbia-run-parallel-institutions/>
  loyal to Belgrade, including the one in Mitrovica, the region’s main urban 
center. Kosovo authorities have likewise imposed a ban on Serb imports 
<https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/kosovo-trade-barriers#:~:text=In%20June%202023%2C%20the%20Kosovan,due%20to%20supply%20chain%20disruptions.>
 , ignoring the pleas of Germany’s special envoy for the Western Balkans, 
Michael Sarrazin. Pristina has acted unilaterally, ignoring the so-called 
normalization talks overseen by Borrell’s office as well as the advice of 
Western capitals.

But as far as Kurti is concerned, heavy-handed tactics pay off and the onus is 
on the Europeans and the Americans. In Kosovo’s view, the West has been 
applying double standards: punishing Pristina for enforcing its sovereignty 
while indulging Vučić, who has refused to cut ties with Russia 
<https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/01/hedging-its-bets-serbia-between-russia-and-the-eu?lang=en&center=europe>
  and join the Western sanctions. Belgrade has been let off the hook over a 
violent incident at the Banjska monastery 
<https://carnegieendowment.org/europe/strategic-europe/2023/09/the-eu-cannot-give-up-on-serbia-and-kosovo?lang=en>
  in September 2023, when paramilitaries linked to the Serbian security 
services attacked Kosovar police, killing one officer and injuring two others. 
And so, Kurti has learned the lesson and applied it. While Western dignitaries 
were wringing hands when earlier this year Kosovo authorities prohibited the 
use of the dinar, Serbia’s currency, in the north or when in 2022 they required 
cars to switch Kosovar licence plates, they did not really push back against 
those moves. On both occasions, Kurti got what he wanted.

Surprisingly enough, Vučić has not gone for a tit for tat. On past occasions, 
he hadn’t been averse to playing the Kosovo card, even threatening to send the 
troops back into what Belgrade considers its province to prevent the “ethnic 
cleansing” of local Serbs. Chances are that Vučić is calculating that Kurti’s 
heavy-handed actions will benefit him. Serbia is going through a honeymoon with 
the EU. First came the agreement on lithium 
<https://www.politico.eu/article/olaf-scholz-maros-sefcovic-lithium-deal-serbia-environmental-concerns/>
  mining co-signed with the German chancellor Olaf Scholz back in July. More 
recently, Belgrade rolled out the red carpet for French President Emmanuel 
Macron, whose visit saw, among other things, the inking of a deal 
<https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/08/30/serbia-inks-27bln-deal-with-france-for-12-rafale-fighter-jets-in-move-away-from-russia>
  to acquire twelve French-made Rafale fighters. Vučić is also in Washington’s 
good books because of the supply—through third countries—of ammunition to 
Ukraine <https://www.ft.com/content/136ed721-fd50-4815-8314-d9df8dc67fd6> . So 
much so, that both the EU and the United States are willing to cut Serbia slack 
over refusing to implement sanctions against Russia. A crisis in Kosovo might 
jeopardize this positive momentum. For the time being, Vučić is perfectly happy 
to see Kurti turning into the West’s bête noire in the Balkans.

The Kosovo deadlock highlights the deficiency of the EU’s enlargement strategy 
<https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/06/can-eu-enlargement-work?lang=en>
 . Fast-track the accession of countries like Kosovo and Serbia and you risk 
importing an unresolved sovereignty issue, not to mention a second Hungary run 
by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s lookalike Vučić. Delay it, and the dispute 
starts to fester. Vučić and Kurti know that their countries will not be joining 
the EU anytime soon. Their priority is retaining power at home rather than 
abiding by Brussels’s demands.

Balkan leaders have learned how to play the West. Vučić has been haggling with 
the big guys—Germany, France, the Biden administration—to some success. Kurti 
has opted for a policy of faits accomplis in Kosovo. By any objective 
yardstick, both politicians have enjoyed success.

The trouble, however, is that things can get out of hand. While we should not 
be overly alarmist about Kosovo, complacency is not advisable either. Last 
year’s Banjska clash has shown us that escalation could be in the cards, with 
people getting killed. Assuming that local leaders would act rationally and 
step over the brink, consciously or not, is not a safe policy. Indeed, dropping 
the ball on Kosovo could raise risk. Especially now that the guard in the EU 
institutions is changing and the U.S. presidential election is injecting even 
more uncertainty.

The West’s priority should be regaining credibility. To this end, the EU and 
the United States should draw clear red lines and react robustly when the 
latter are crossed. Restarting the normalization talks between Serbia and 
Kosovo should be high on the priority list of incoming EU high representative 
Kaja Kallas. Though Kosovo might not loom as large as other challenges, such as 
the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, it continues to be a top litmus test for EU 
foreign policy.



 

-- 
http:www.antic.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/0e2d01db0424%24d53dea20%247fb9be60%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to