euractiv.com 
<https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/us-tells-serbia-to-zero-out-russian-ownership-of-largest-national-oil-company/>
  


US tells Serbia to zero out Russian ownership of largest national oil company


Georgi Gotev

~3 minutes

  _____  

To avoid US sanctions, Serbia should completely remove Russian ownership of the 
National Oil Company of Serbia (NOCS), the country's largest energy company, US 
Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs James O'Brien 
said. 

On Friday, the administration of outgoing US President Joe Biden imposed its 
broadest package of sanctions 
<https://www.euractiv.com/section/global-europe/news/us-hits-russian-oil-with-toughest-sanctions-yet-in-bid-to-give-ukraine-trump-leverage/>
  to date, targeting Russia's oil and gas revenues. The sanctions target 
Gazprom's subsidiaries in several countries, notably NIS Novi Sad, a pillar of 
Serbia's energy system. 

Since 2008, Russian state-owned Gazprom Neft and its parent company Gazprom 
have held a majority stake of 56.15% in NIS, with Serbia holding 29.87%. Last 
year, NIS's revenues rose to €3.3 billion, equivalent to 4.5% of Serbia's GDP. 

As Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić said 
<https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/gazprom-neft-given-45-days-exit-ownership-serbias-nis-president-says-2025-01-10/>
  on Friday, Serbia has 45 days to end Russian ownership of NIS. 

O'Brien was clear that the risk can only become zero if Russian ownership is 
also zero and that as Serbia has chosen the European path, it must focus on its 
strengthened relations with European and American companies, which have already 
delivered results. 

He added that the US expects open and honest discussions about the way forward 
and noted that the US position was unlikely to change under the upcoming Trump 
administration. 

Commenting on Russia’s purchase of NIS, he said Russia had bought it for very 
little, yet it likely took billions of euros out of the country in recent 
years. 

Serbia sold 51% of NIS to Russia's Gazprom in 2008 for what critics called a 
bargain price of €400 million, plus a promised investment of €550 million. 

In 2022, Vučić mentioned the possibility of Serbia "taking over" NIS. On 5 
January, after warning that sanctions could be imposed on NIS, Vučić said that 
Serbia had the money to take over the company even without borrowing but 
suggested that this was not a good solution because the deal would fill 
Russia's coffers. 

Most of Serbia's crude oil imports come through Croatian oil pipeline operator 
Jadranski Naftovod. If NIS remains majority-owned by Gazprom Neft, Serbia is 
likely to face massive oil shortages because the Croatian partner will not 
continue to supply a company that's under US sanctions. 

(Georgi Gotev | Euractiv.com) 

 

-- 
http:www.antic.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/senet/12aa01db6662%243a29fce0%24ae7df6a0%24%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to