Yeah I thought of going to the junkyard and pull out an Altima or Maxima MAF
but installing it in the car would be extremely difficult because you have
to toggle around with the computer. I think that's what project 200sx had to
do. Please educate me on this subject people. I'm really looking forward to
getting rid of that little tiny maf on my car. I'm getting too much
criticism from people telling me the maf will upset the whole point of an
aftermarket intake
----- Original Message -----
From: "jason wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sentra Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: SML: Smaller Diameter CAI
> >I think it will have more bottom end power with no loss at the top. At
> >least that's what I am hoping for. I am going to work with hotshot to
get
> >it right.
> I think this has been addressed before, but could you not achieve the same
> low-end gain by upsizing the MAF to match the CAI's diameter, instead of
> downsizing the pipe? Project 200SX gained some low-end when it got the
> bigger MAF, correct? Are these low-end gains a function of the velocity of
> the airflow through the CAI (in which case the smaller CAI would be
better,
> right?) or a function of the harmonics of the piping (in which case
diameter
> would seem to be irrelevant)? Pardon me if I am totally off-base here, but
I
> am curious as to what precisely is going on to affect power and, all else
> being equal, I would prefer a big, manly intake to a spaghetti-thin,
> girly-man intake ;).
>
> Jonesing for underhood manliness,
> JWolfe
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Attachments are not accepted by the list. Post a link instead.
