I was referring like I said to renting the tools.
Like I said, most auto parts stores, any major chain,
i.e. Pep Boys, Autozone, trash auto, napa, etc..
Have a rental policy for tools they know you will only
use once a blue moon anyway. They however make
you "buy" the part. Then tell you to return it. Some places
now have a sign-out sheet or something to that effect.
If you ask the guy how to rent a tool behind the counter
he will tell you to "buy" it and return it. That is what I meant
and there is no freaking moral dilema with doing that.
It is their freaking policy, so anyone that says it's wrong to
do that can take it up with the store owners and stop bitching
at the people that suggested doing it that way.

Tb



----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sentra Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 8:33 PM
Subject: SML: wrong option


>
>
>
> QUOTE
> "Not true at all. Most auto parts stores rent these tools out. All you
> do is buy it and return it. That is what you are supposed
> to do. How is that the wrong option to give?"
>
> RESPONSE
> Renting and buying are different. When you rent something, it is
understood that
> you are going to use it and bring it back for someone else to use.  When
you buy
> it, you are purchasing for your own private use to keep, not to return and
let
> others use it. Most people see it as dishonest when you "buy" something
just to
> use it and return it. It is the "Wal-Mart Syndrome". It gives you a
white-trash
> sorta reputation. If you honestly don't think there is a difference, open
your
> own business and sell things.  See how you feel when people "buy"
something, use
> the hell out of it, then return it just because they're done with it. Then
> you're stuck with a used product that you cannot sell for full price.  I
don't
> think it's necessarily "wrong" but I couldn't do it. Hell, I have a hard
time
> returning things to stores because I'm dissatisfied with it let alone
something
> that I just used because I'm a cheap bastard.
>
> Look at it this way. You get a brand new power painter for your birthday.
You
> have no need for it so you decide to sell it.  Somebody buys it from you,
paints
> their whole house and makes it lok sweet. Then they decide to return the
painter
> to you because they said they don't like it or whatever. Now you have a
nasty,
> dirty, used painter and he has a sweet looking house for free.  Had you
"rented"
> him the painter, you could've kept the money for him using it.
>
>
>
>
>




Reply via email to