With respect, the problem with asking whether "the generally healthy
college kid with SIRS criteria and a strep throat really needs a lactate
and blood cultures" is that it presupposes a  correct and benign diagnosis
requiring only simple outpatient therapy. The question correctly implies a
group at low risk, but we will undoubtedly make mistakes. A rare patient
will return to be recharacterized as strep bacteremia or pneumonia with
organ dysfunction, peritonsillar abscess, or meningococcal meningitis. In
some of these cases, perhaps, earlier hints of serious trouble were
overlooked. We of course will be held responsible, and hold ourselves
responsible, for our oversights. There would be fewer of them if we were
more vigilant.

I am often reminded that expert opinion is regarded as the lowest quality
of evidence. Even in groups at higher risk for severe sepsis, however, many
of us assume our clinical judgments (which usually fall short of expert
opinion) will distinguish those who are "really sick" from those who are
not. I think this is an error. In all likelihood, some of us are better at
this game than others, but undoubtedly we all have lapses. Few if any of us
have data regarding the accuracy of our own clinical judgments, yet many if
not most of us seem quite eager to overestimate our own abilities even when
it is the patient and family who bear the risk.

The purpose of a screen is to detect the maximum number of cases - and
perhaps thereby protect patients from our sometimes faulty clinical
judgment. SIRS &/or infection should often prompt an additional screen for
organ dysfunction including an elevated lactate. The treating physician or
nurse makes the screening decision, and all cases do not have to be
directed to the ED. The cost of a lactate in our hospital is well below
$1.00. A normal lactate does not exclude severe sepsis. An elevated lactate
can seldom be dismissed. Some maintain that lactate is a better ED screen
for severity of illness than many of the standard ED tests we run, and a
better predictor of who should stay, length of stay, cost of stay,
development of multi-organ failure, and death. Blood cultures are
substantially more expensive, results are delayed, and so they may deserve
a little more thought before ordering, but we've all seen patients called
back to the hospital for positive blood cultures.

Should we always follow SIRS &/or infection with a screen for organ
dysfunction? "Always" and "never" are unforgiving rules that may not work
well here. The answer may partially depend on where the patient is
identified. Already hospitalized patients are in a special risk group with
perhaps a better reason to screen in the great majority. I'd agree the
answer is probably "no" for many low grade fevers, sore throats and runny
noses in the ED or office. One practical issue is that EDs or offices could
become overcrowded with people at low risk waiting for their organ
dysfunction screens to return while delaying necessary attention from those
who really need it.

Should rare mistakes result in "always" screening subsequent low risk
patients with the identical clinical picture for evidence of organ
dysfunction? Probably not, but it should lead to a more thorough search for
those subtle hints of real trouble, reasons to complete the screening, and
an early return visit or call for some of those considered safe for
discharge.

Just my $0.02
Ron Elkin, MD
Pulmonary/Critical Care
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco






On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Steve Chabala <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think Sue's question gets at the larger question of the need for testing
> of ALL patients with SIRS criteria and evidence of infection.  All such
> patients should be directed by their primary care doctors to come to the ER
> for sepsis evaluation?  Does the generally healthy college kid with SIRS
> criteria and a strep throat really need a lactate and blood cultures drawn?
>  Probably not.  I'm curious to know if there is any literature to address
> this sort of issue.  When does sepsis screening yield to common sense?
>
> Steve Chabala D.O., F.A.C.E.P.
> _______________________________________________
> Sepsisgroups mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to