We are a small hospital with no intensivist coverage.  We are looking for a 
sepsis order set/ protocol from an institution with this situation... anyone 
able to help?

Emily Bradshaw RN, BSN, CCRN
Clinical Educator, Critical Care and Acute Care
WellStar Paulding Hospital
[email protected]
470-245-3536

-----Original Message-----
From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 12:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 159, Issue 1

Send Sepsisgroups mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of Sepsisgroups digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 158, Issue 6 TIME ZERO
      (Richards, Ann)
   2. Re: Joint Commission Performance Measure Time Zero (Brandy Cuevas)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 12:38:34 +0000
From: "Richards, Ann" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 158, Issue 6
        TIME ZERO
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252

In response the question about time zero, we have concerns about this as well.  
The way the abstraction process is written for CMS it does not focus on what is 
the right thing clinically.  Also, it creates a bit of a paradox in that you 
don't have to start timing administration of fluids until they meet the septic 
shock definition.  However, they can't meet the septic shock definition until 
the fail fluid resusitiation so it is very unclear.  I expect this to change 
again before the measure is finalized.  We have decieded in our ED not to 
change anything at this time and keep time zero as ED triage because that keeps 
the focus on early recognition and early goal directed therapy.  I don't want 
my front line staff getting confused and worked out over the specifics of time 
zero, I want them focused on providing the best care for the patient, which we 
have seen starts when you walk in the door.

Ann M. Richards, RN, BSN, CIC
Special Projects Coordinator - Infection Prevention & Quality Improvement 
Departments Infection Control Practitioner - Infection Prevention Department 
Overlook Medical Center - Atlantic Health System Office 908-522-2129 IP Fax 
908-598-2368 QI Fax 908-522-5315 Cell 973-294-8330

The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the 
person(s) identified above.? This communication may contain work product which 
is privileged and confidential, and may contain content which is regulated by 
Federal law.? If you are not an intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible to deliver this to the intended recipient, you have received this 
message in error and any review, distribution or copying of it by you is 
prohibited.? If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately, and delete the message.? E-mail and communication system 
messages generated by members of the Atlantic Health System workforce may not 
necessarily reflect the views of Atlantic Health System, its officers, 
directors or management.




Today's Topics:

   1. Joint Commission Performance Measure Time Zero (Angela Craig)
   2. Re: Joint Commission Performance Measure (Angela Craig)
   3. Re: CMS Guidelines (Brandy Cuevas)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:32:10 -0500
From: Angela Craig <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'"
        <[email protected]>,
        "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Joint Commission Performance Measure Time
        Zero
Message-ID:
        
<343E31412FC9094487B54371286ADDA01F2B14CB48@D109EXCHMB.crmchealth.hospital>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

OK so most of us have changed to time of triage for time zero  I would assume.  
I had a meeting with our data abstractor for Sepsis Core Measures yesterday and 
she mentioned time zero would be changing.  She then showed me the manual for 
the data abstractors.

It stated for Septic Shock Present the following:  Criteria

There must be documentation of severe sepsis present AND Tissue hypoperfusion 
persists after crystalloid fluid administration evidenced by either SBP <90, or 
MAP<65, or a decrease in SBP by >40points OR Lactate level is >4

Soooo My abstractor was under the impression this would be the new time zero 
based on this.

There was a sheet on Severe Sepsis Present as well.  What concerns me is that 
based on documentation is what will que them for time zero.  I am worried that 
there will be delays in care if that is how it will be determined.  What are 
everyone's thoughts?

Am I missing something?  Will everyone just stay with time zero that we feel is 
"clinically correct" and consistent across the country and just let core 
measures monitor something different?  Can someone help me understand this.  I 
really hope I am not reading something correctly or just not understanding.

Thank you in advance - I am soo grateful for this List serve!!!

Angela Craig APN,MS,CCNS
Clinical Nurse Specialist
Intensive Care Unit
Cookeville Regional Medical Center
931-783-5035

This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by Mimecast.  
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20150528/389fe4eb/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:22:49 -0500
From: Angela Craig <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'"
        <[email protected]>,
        "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Joint Commission Performance Measure
Message-ID:
        
<343E31412FC9094487B54371286ADDA01F2B14CB47@D109EXCHMB.crmchealth.hospital>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

We just certified and I think the 3 hour bundle compliance is great.  We also 
chose to look at screening compliance.  We have the units on all the floors 
screen a sampling to make sure they are done accurately.  2 other areas we 
chose to look at were time to goal with CVP and SCVO2.  Just a few ideas for 
you.

Angela Craig APN,MS,CCNS
Clinical Nurse Specialist
Intensive Care Unit
Cookeville Regional Medical Center
931-783-5035


From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Joint Commission Performance Measure

Good Afternoon,

I will be recertifying for the second time and curious to see what is "IN" 
right now for the Joint Commission performance measures.  I was leaning towards 
3 hour bundle compliance, lactate clearance but am looking for any other 
suggestions to get me to 4 measures.

Thank you!

Megan Borden, BSN, RN, CEN
Sepsis Coordinator
Memorial Hospital Jacksonville
3625 University Blvd South
Jacksonville, FL 32216
Office: 904-702-6080
Mobile: 904-334-7079



Notice: This email contains confidential or proprietary information which may 
be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient (s). If an 
addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please notify the 
author by replying to this message. If you are not the named recipient, you are 
not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email, 
and should immediately delete it from your computer system.

This email message has been delivered safely and archived online by Mimecast.  
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20150528/bff72c25/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:03:11 -0500
From: Brandy Cuevas <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] CMS Guidelines
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Debbie,
It is my understanding that a patient with severe sepsis only has to have a 
repeat lactate within 6 hours if initial lactate is elevated.  Only in septic 
shock patients does the patient need the focused exam or two of the other items.

Maybe I am misunderstanding the measure?  My perception is if after the initial 
3 hour requirement (lactate, blood culture, abx, and fluid), if the "repeat 
exam" shows hypotension and the patient is placed on a vasopressor, then at 
that time (which is the re-assessment) they need the focused exam or two of the 
other items.  If they are not hypotensive/on vasopressors, then they are only 
severe sepsis and not septic shock which does not require the additional 
testing?!

If you find out differently, please let me know!  I have attached a sepsis 
guideline sheet that a hospital shared on the listserv that has been helpful to 
me.

Brandy

Brandy Cuevas, BSN, RN
Quality Improvement Coordinator
William Newton Hospital
1300 E. 5th Ave.
Winfield, KS  67156
620-222-6225
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication may contain private, 
confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of 
the designated and/or duly authorized recipient(s). If you are not the intended 
recipient or have received this email in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by email and permanently delete all copies of this email including 
all attachments without reading them. If you are the intended recipient, secure 
the contents in a manner that conforms to all applicable state and/or federal 
requirements related to privacy and confidentiality of such information.

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] CMS Guidelines

So, I've read through the new CMS Guidelines and it states that a repeat 
assessment must be completed within 6 hrs with either a focused exam (including 
VS, cardiopulmonary exam, cap refill, peripheral pulse eval and skin exam) or 
any two of the four: CVP, SV02, bedside cardiovascular ultrasound, passive leg 
raise or fluid challenge.

At our hospital, we have the "shift evaluation" and "shift re-evaluation."  If 
the nurse documents the "shift re-evaluation" they are basically saying nothing 
has changed since the last evaluation.  I'm wondering if that will suffice, or 
if they actually have to do another complete head-to-toe assessment.  Any 
thoughts??

Thanks,
Debbie

Debbie Chambless, MSN, RN, ARNP-C
Sepsis Coordinator
Osceola Regional Medical Center
Kissimmee, Fl 34741
Office: 407-518-3949
Cell: 772-807-0525

~~Recognizing sepsis as a global enemy.  Hoping for global unity in finding a 
solution~~

[cid:[email protected]]


________________________________
The materials in this email are private and may contain Protected Health 
Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action 
in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20150528/86488c05/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 18061 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20150528/86488c05/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Sepsis Core Measure Requirements.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 32422 bytes
Desc: Sepsis Core Measure Requirements.docx
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20150528/86488c05/attachment.bin>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


------------------------------

End of Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 158, Issue 6
********************************************



The information contained in this email is intended only for the use of the 
person(s) identified above. This communication may contain work product which 
is privileged and confidential, and may contain content which is regulated by 
Federal law. If you are not an intended recipient or the employee or agent 
responsible to deliver this to the intended recipient, you have received this 
message in error and any review, distribution or copying of it by you is 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately, and delete the message. E-mail and communication system 
messages generated by members of the Atlantic Health System workforce may not 
necessarily reflect the views of Atlantic Health System, its officers, 
directors or management.



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 07:54:58 -0500
From: Brandy Cuevas <[email protected]>
To: Angela Craig <[email protected]>,
        "'[email protected]'"      
<[email protected]>,
        "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Joint Commission Performance Measure Time
        Zero
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I am also confused on Time Zero as it says patients entering through the ED, 
the time of presentation is the time the patient is triaged.

Also, Can anyone clarify the 30ml/kg for me.  Is it your understanding that any 
patient that presents with sepsis will get 30ml/kg regardless if they are in 
septic shock or severe sepsis?

Thanks in advance!!

Brandy Cuevas, BSN, RN
Quality Improvement Coordinator
William Newton Hospital
1300 E. 5th Ave.
Winfield, KS  67156
620-222-6225
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication may contain private, 
confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of 
the designated and/or duly authorized recipient(s). If you are not the intended 
recipient or have received this email in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by email and permanently delete all copies of this email including 
all attachments without reading them. If you are the intended recipient, secure 
the contents in a manner that conforms to all applicable state and/or federal 
requirements related to privacy and confidentiality of such information.

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Angela Craig
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:32 AM
To: '[email protected]'; [email protected]
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Joint Commission Performance Measure Time Zero


OK so most of us have changed to time of triage for time zero  I would assume.  
I had a meeting with our data abstractor for Sepsis Core Measures yesterday and 
she mentioned time zero would be changing.  She then showed me the manual for 
the data abstractors.

It stated for Septic Shock Present the following:  Criteria

There must be documentation of severe sepsis present AND Tissue hypoperfusion 
persists after crystalloid fluid administration evidenced by either SBP <90, or 
MAP<65, or a decrease in SBP by >40points OR Lactate level is >4

Soooo My abstractor was under the impression this would be the new time zero 
based on this.

There was a sheet on Severe Sepsis Present as well.  What concerns me is that 
based on documentation is what will que them for time zero.  I am worried that 
there will be delays in care if that is how it will be determined.  What are 
everyone?s thoughts?

Am I missing something?  Will everyone just stay with time zero that we feel is 
?clinically correct? and consistent across the country and just let core 
measures monitor something different?  Can someone help me understand this.  I 
really hope I am not reading something correctly or just not understanding.

Thank you in advance - I am soo grateful for this List serve!!!

Angela Craig APN,MS,CCNS
Clinical Nurse Specialist
Intensive Care Unit
Cookeville Regional Medical Center
931-783-5035




________________________________
The materials in this email are private and may contain Protected Health 
Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action 
in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20150529/ea10e163/attachment.htm>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


------------------------------

End of Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 159, Issue 1
********************************************



________________________________
This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or 
proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc. 
("WellStar") and is intended only for the individual or entity to whom 
addressed. This email may contain information that is held to be privileged, 
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of 
this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
unauthorized access, dissemination, distribution or copying of any information 
from this email is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to criminal and/or 
civil liability. If you have received this email in error, please notify the 
sender by reply email and then delete this email and its attachments from your 
computer. - Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to