You are correct June, and in fact, a mandatory 2/4 SIRS criteria has been 
removed from the definition of sepsis since the 2001 Sepsis Definitions 
Conference (Levy CCM 2003). This was further bolstered by the Kaukonen article 
in NEJM 2015 showing persistently elevated mortality in sepsis patients with 
0/4 and 1/4  SIRS criteria. Why CMS would require this non-standard criteria 
for review is unclear, but clearly omits patients whom clinically meet severe 
sepsis (now just "sepsis") criteria.

As you probably saw from Lori Harmon's email from SSC, they have responded 
promptly and adjusted their definitions to align with this landmark article, 
with no mention of any number of SIRS criteria required for sepsis diagnosis. 
We can only hope that CMS follows suit.

Ryan

_______________________________
Ryan Arnold, MD
Director of Research, Department of Emergency Medicine
Clinical Investigator, Value Institute
Christiana Care Health System

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of June Curry
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Feb. 23rd JAMA article negates severe sepsis and SIRS

Dr. Townsend,

     A number of our physicians have brought to our attention an article 
published by JAMA on Feb. 23rd titled, "The third international consensus 
definitions for sepsis and septic shock".  It is their understanding that this 
article negates severe sepsis and SIRS.  Our physicians are wanting to know 
when CMS will address these changes and how/when they will affect the current 
SEP-1 measure.  I would appreciate any information you can share that I can 
pass along to our providers.

Thanks!

_________________________
June R. Curry, RHIA
Manager, Evidence Based Care
Process Improvement and Innovation

[cid:[email protected]]<http://www.methodisthealth.org/>

1211 Union Ave. Rm 604
Memphis, TN 38104

mobile 901-568-9431 | email [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to