Anyone out there going for the TJC Sepsis Certification?  I am wondering what 
Databases everyone is using to enter their sepsis patients.  

Michelle Foss RN
Critical Care Data Coordinator
Shawnee Mission Medical Center
913.632.2429 office





-----Original Message-----
From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2016 11:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 216, Issue 4

Authentication-Results: symauth.service.identifier; spf=neutral; 
senderid=neutral

Send Sepsisgroups mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of Sepsisgroups digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Repeat Lactate ([email protected])
   2. Re: EGDT (Seckel, Maureen M)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 13:00:38 +0000
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Repeat Lactate
Message-ID:
        
<595c1ea7ab3d9f479d0c6956995cfa9b21fa4...@fwdcwpmsghcmd4c.hca.corpad.net>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,

At our facility most of the patients have infection or suspected infection 
documented in the nursing screening. Nursing documentation of infection or 
suspected infection may be used according the guidelines. Another possible 
documentation area by the physician is found in the indications for imaging. I 
often find that our providers are using sepsis or possible infection (abscess 
for example) as the indication for a chest x-ray or CT scan. 

Thanks
Meghan Lux, BSN, CPHQ
Sepsis Coordinator
Clinical Outcomes Department
Metropolitan Methodist Hospital, a campus of Methodist Hospital
1310 Mc Cullough Avenue
San Antonio, TX 78212
(210) 757-2341 (Office)
(210) 857-5751 (Cell)



-----Original Message-----
From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 7:44 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 215, Issue 2

Send Sepsisgroups mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of Sepsisgroups digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Repeat Lactate (Claire Sirois-Melvin)
   2. Re: Time Zero (Gibbs, Katie)
   3. 30 cc's/kg (Pender.Linda)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:24:25 +0000
From: Claire Sirois-Melvin <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Repeat Lactate
Message-ID:
        
<by1pr0601mb15290477a6ae390e28abf291d7...@by1pr0601mb1529.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello,

We are having challenges at some of our facilities with meeting bundle 
compliance due to timing of repeat lactates. The issue is often that even 
though we are drawing more than 1 Lactate, the second lactate is actually 
becoming our "Initial Lactate" due to timing of Severe Sepsis. According to 
Technical Specifications,  the "initial Lactate"  is the one drawn closest to 
time 0.
For example,

Patient comes in with a cough, fever,  and an elevated HR at 1420, MD orders 
lactate and Blood Culture which are drawn at 1430. Lactate results come back at 
3.0 at 1515. MD orders fluids and antibiotics at 1530, but does not document  
infection until 1700 (? pneumonia in admission order.) Repeat Lactate ordered 
and drawn at 1830 with result of 2.2 ... In this scenario, the Severe Sepsis 
time zero is 1700. Based on abstraction guidelines, this makes the second 
Lactate at 1830 the "initial Lactate" since it is the one drawn closest to time 
0. Providers do not order another lactate to be drawn until the next morning 
since the value is trending downward. This case fails due to no repeat Lactate 
within 6 hrs of SST zero.

This is frustrating for providers since the care is appropriate, and just the 
timing of documentation throws off the timing of initial lactate.

Is anyone having similar challenges or does anyone have a 
process/recommendation in place for such scenerios.

Any information you can share would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in 
advance!

Claire

Claire Sirois-Melvin RN, BSN
Quality Measure Resource Specialist - Steward Healthcare
824 Oak Street, Brockton, MA 02301
Email: [email protected]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20160802/d975edce/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:44:05 -0400
From: "Gibbs, Katie" <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Zhukov,
        Marina  (Tacoma)" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Murray, Sandra" <[email protected]>,
        "'[email protected]'"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Time Zero
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Our Indiana Hospital Association gave this for examples, I found it helpful. 
The 3rd bullet point gives good clarification.  

Example:  

Patient was noted to have purulent drainage from the surgical wound on 
01-10-20xx at 22:00, when the physician documented ?suspect surgical wound 
infection.  A culture of the surgical site was obtained.  At 01:30 on 
01-11-20xx, blood pressure was noted to be 74/40.  At 02:00, 30 minutes later, 
temperature was 38.4 and pulse was 118.  Severe Sepsis Presentation Time is 
02:00.
?Physician/APN/PA documentation of severe sepsis or suspected severe sepsis is 
acceptable.

?If a suspected infection, severe sepsis or septic shock is in an ED physician 
note without a specific time documented within the note use the time the note 
was started or opened.

?If severe sepsis is present on arrival to the Emergency Department or severe 
sepsis is identified in triage, the Severe Sepsis Presentation Time is the time 
the patient was triaged in the Emergency Department. If more than one triage 
time is documented (e.g., ?Triage started? and ?Triage completed?) use the 
later time reflecting triage is completed.

?For patients with multiple episodes of severe sepsis, abstract only the first 
episode.

?If there are multiple times documented when the last criterion to meet the 
definition of severe sepsis or physician/APN/PA documentation of severe sepsis 
occurred, and they are at variance with each other, use the earliest time.

?If criteria for severe sepsis are met after physician/APN/PA documentation of 
septic shock, enter the time the physician/APN/PA documented septic shock.

?If criteria for severe sepsis are not documented and there is not 
physician/APN/PA documentation of severe sepsis, but there is physician/APN/PA 
documentation of septic shock, enter the earliest time septic shock was 
documented

Hope this helps! 

Katie Gibbs, RN, BSN
Quality Improvement Specialist
Witham Health Services
PH 765-485-8459

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this e-mail, including any 
attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain 
confidential and legally privileged information. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information in any manner is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.



-----Original Message-----
From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 5:51 PM
To: Zhukov, Marina (Tacoma)
Cc: Murray, Sandra; '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] Time Zero

Hello everyone,

Just an fyi- At the UWMC we have a similar situation to what Marina has 
describe:  We rarely hit all three criteria for severe sepsis when the patient 
walks in the ED door.  The patient usually meets criteria later during the ED 
visit.

Thanks,
Mary L. Ransom, RN, BSN, MA, CPHQ
Core Measures Project Manager
Center for Clinical Excellence
Box 359425
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle WA 98195
Office Days: Mon, Tues and Thurs
***************************************
This message and any attachments to it is protected by coordinated quality 
improvement/risk management/peer review confidentiality under RCW 
70.41.200/4.24.250/43.70.510.  Privileged confidential patient identifiable 
information also may be contained in this message.  This information is meant 
only for the use of the intended recipients.  If you are not the intended 
recipient or if the message has been addressed to you in error, do not read, 
disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this 
transmission. Instead, please notify the sender by reply email and then destroy 
all copies of the message and any attachments.

On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Zhukov, Marina (Tacoma) wrote:

> 
> This does not happen for the majority of our sepsis cases. Keep in 
> mind that patient needs to meet ALL criteria (infx, two SIRS and organ 
> dysfunction) during/before triage in order to use triage time. There is 
> always little something that shifts the clock so that triage time could not 
> be used.
> 
> ?
> 
> Also, with just added SEP-1 Additional Notes for Abstraction, Version
> 5.1 there is new clarification: ?if the note (physician?s note) states severe 
> sepsis was present on admission, use the earliest documented admission 
> date/time?
> 
> ?
> 
> Marina Zhukov, RN, BSN
> 
> Clinical Data Abstractor
> 
> CHI Franciscan Health
> 
> ?
> 
> ?
> 
> ?
> 
> From: Sepsisgroups
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> Madrid, Pamela A
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:45 AM
> To: Belfi, Karen; Dena Videtic; Murray, Sandra; 
> '[email protected]'
> Subject: [Sepsis Groups] Time Zero
> 
> ?
> 
> CAUTION: This email is not from a CHI source. Only click links or open 
> attachments you know are safe.
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________
> 
> 
> Hi Everyone!? Just a follow-up question/comment on the time zero discussion.
> 
> ?
> 
> For determination of time zero for patients who present to the 
> Emergency Department, how are you applying this portion of the Notes for 
> Abstraction on page 1-232. By this it seems that we should we be using triage 
> time for the majority of the severe sepsis and septic shock patients??
> 
> ?
> 
> Severe Sepsis Time
> 
> If severe sepsis is present on arrival to the Emergency Department or 
> severe sepsis is identified in triage, the Severe Sepsis Presentation Time is 
> the time the patient was triaged in the Emergency Department. If more than 
> one triage time is documented (e.g., ?Triage started? and ?Triage completed?) 
> use the later time reflecting triage is completed.
> 
> ?
> 
> ?
> 
> Pam Madrid, RN, MS, CCRN, CCNS
> 
> Clinical Nurse Specialist ? Critical Care ? Mercy Hospital, part of 
> Allina Health
> 
> Phone: 763-236-8331 ? Pager: 612-654-0624 ? Fax: 612-236-8304 ? 
> [email protected]
> 
> Mail Route 51415 ? 4050 Coon Rapids Blvd ? Coon Rapids, MN 55434
> 
> ?
> 
> ?Information is random and miscellaneous, but knowledge is orderly and 
> cumulative.?? Daniel Boorstin
> 
> ?
> 
> ?
> 
> Image removed by sender.
> This message contains information that is confidential and may be 
> privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the 
> addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any 
> information contained in the message. If you have received the message in 
> error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message.
> 
> 
>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:52:54 +0000
From: Pender.Linda <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] 30 cc's/kg
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

How are you all working with your physicians to encourage the use of 30cc's/kg? 
Especially in CHF and Renal patients?

Linda G. Pender RRT-NPS
Sepsis Coordinator
Patient Care Services  Administration
phone: 478-633-6806  pager: 4444
KNOW Sepsis: Inside & Out
[MCCG...World Class Care!  See our website...]<http://www.navicenthealth.org/>
Email: [email protected]


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this e-mail message, 
including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, privileged, 
and/or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, retransmission, use, 
disclosure, dissemination, or other use of, or taking any action in reliance 
upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient 
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, or by 
calling (478) 633-7272, and destroy the original message, attachments, and all 
copies thereof on all computers and in any other form. Thank you. Navicent 
Health. http://www.navicenthealth.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20160802/063ee838/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9451 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20160802/063ee838/attachment.png>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


------------------------------

End of Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 215, Issue 2
********************************************


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:57:30 +0000
From: "Seckel, Maureen M" <[email protected]>
To: Pender.Linda <[email protected]>,
        "'[email protected]'"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Sepsis Groups] EGDT
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

We have not been monitoring CVPs since Process.  In general, central lines are 
placed when there are pressor requirements.  Arterial lines are used as needed 
for "higher" pressor requirements or in  patients who have difficulty in 
obtaining reliable manual BPs on pressors.  We are using the Edwards monitors - 
EV1000 for minimally invasive Flotrac  or non-invasive Clearsight in patients 
who are not quickly responsive or are felt to be more complex to monitor volume 
responsiveness via stroke volume.

CVP alone is really not considered a reliable measure of fluid responsiveness 
in septic patients.
Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul J. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. 
Annals of Intensive Care 2011;1:1.
Marik PE, Baram M, Bahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid 
responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven 
mares. Chest 2008;134:172-178.
Marik P, Bellomo R.  A rationale approach to giving fluid in sepsis.  British 
Journal of Anesthesia 2016;116:339-49.


Maureen A. Seckel, APRN, ACNS-BC, CCNS, CCRN, FCCM Lead CNS Medical Pulmonary 
Critical Care Sepsis Coordinator Christiana Care Health System
4755 Ogletown-Stanton Road
3E29
Newark, DE 19718
Office 302 733-6023
[email protected]
[cid:[email protected]]

From: Sepsisgroups [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Pender.Linda
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 1:54 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: [Sepsis Groups] EGDT

Is anyone still using EGDT with placing CVP lines and arterial line to monitor 
fluid status? If so, do you feel this is beneficial?

Linda G. Pender RRT-NPS
Sepsis Coordinator
Patient Care Services  Administration
phone: 478-633-6806  pager: 4444
KNOW Sepsis: Inside & Out
[MCCG...World Class Care!  See our website...]<http://www.navicenthealth.org/>
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information transmitted in this e-mail message, 
including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) or 
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, privileged, 
and/or proprietary information. Any unauthorized review, retransmission, use, 
disclosure, dissemination, or other use of, or taking any action in reliance 
upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient 
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this 
message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, or by 
calling (478) 633-7272, and destroy the original message, attachments, and all 
copies thereof on all computers and in any other form. Thank you. Navicent 
Health. http://www.navicenthealth.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20160804/d27fc915/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9014 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20160804/d27fc915/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9451 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: 
<http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/pipermail/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org/attachments/20160804/d27fc915/attachment-0001.png>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org


------------------------------

End of Sepsisgroups Digest, Vol 216, Issue 4
********************************************

_______________________________________________
Sepsisgroups mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sepsisgroups.org/listinfo.cgi/sepsisgroups-sepsisgroups.org

Reply via email to