On May 2, 1:06 pm, "Victor 'Zverok' Shepelev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Faithfully, I think, that the most naturally will be to do.. well, the most
> natural thing:
>
> class D < Sequel::Model
> end
>
> class B < Sequel::Model
> end
>
> module A
> class B < Sequel::Model
> end
>
> class C < Sequel::Model
> belongs_to :b #associates to A::B
> has_many :ds #associates to ::D
> end
> end
>
> both cases of C's associations can be easily evaluated TO CLASS, VISIBLE
> WHEN ASSOCIATION IS DEFINED. It requires only one thing: early evaluation of
> "to what class association points".
>
> What do you think? If you are agree to my logic, I can think further for a
> "right" patch (OK, my initial patch was really naive).
Unfortunately, this would break the principal of least surprise for
the following code:
module A
class B < Sequel::Model
has_many :cs #associates to ::C, not A::C
end
class C < Sequel::Model
belongs_to :b #associates to A::B
end
end
However, if you can make the following work, I'll consider applying
the patch:
module A
class B < Sequel::Model
has_many :cs #associates to A::C
belongs_to :c, :class=>"::C" # associates to ::C
belongs_to :b, :class=>"B" # associates to A::B
end
class C < Sequel::Model
belongs_to :b #associates to A::B
has_many :bs, :class=>"::B", # associates to ::B
has_many :cs, :class=>"C", # associates to A::C
end
end
class B < Sequel::Model
end
class C < Sequel::Model
end
Jeremy
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sequel-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to sequel-talk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
