You're probably looking for many_to_one 2008/12/19 Bryan Richardson <[email protected]>
> > Nevermind... I now see the :one_to_one option available in the > one_to_many method in Sequel::Model. > > -- > Bryan > > On Dec 18, 12:11 pm, Bryan Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I'm in the process of converting an existing Ruby application from > > ActiveRecord to Sequel. I have a table in my application database in > > which each row in the table always has one and only one association > > with a row of data in another table. In ActiveRecord, I represented > > this relationship with has_one/belongs_to. However, it looks as > > though Sequel doesn't have a has_one association. > > > > Given how mature and widespread Sequel is, I'm sure there's a way to > > represent a relationship such as this. Can anyone give me any > > pointers for doing so? > > > > -- > > Thanks! > > Bryan > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
