On Mar 2, 11:50 am, Clive Crous <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/3/2 Jeremy Evans <[email protected]> > > > Until Sequel supports this directly (if ever) > > I did say it's incredibly "hackish" ;) > I must admit I like that syntax though. Would you consider a patch which > supported that in a more formal manner?
The reason I don't like it is while it results in the same SQL syntax, it doesn't obey the same semantics. Symbol#[], when added by Sequel, returns instances of SQL::Function, not SQL::Type (which doesn't exist). Any patch would have to use a different method and return an instance a different class, which would defeat the purpose as it probably would be more verbose than String#lit. Just use String#lit, it's the best solution to this problem. Jeremy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
