On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Jeremy Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still thinking about how to handle that. I'm leaning towards > keeping them in the same gem, officially maintained (bug fixes but no > additional features), but optional. If anyone wants to take > responsibility for one or more of these features as a plugin, I might > remove that feature completely from the repository and point people to > another repository containing a better maintained version. For > example, if someone else wanted to take the model caching feature and > expand it (e.g. make many_to_one associations use it), I'd be open to > that.
That makes sense. For what it's worth, dataset pagination and model hooks are among my favorite things about Sequel. I like the idea of keeping useful but not crucial features like this as optional, maintained-but-not-enhanced members of the main gem, at least until someone is interested in breaking them off into plugins and enhancing them. - Ryan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
