On Apr 9, 4:31 pm, Joel VanderWerf <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sequel result sets don't seem to implement #none?, though they do have
> #any? Easy to improvise, but #none? is nice for readability...
any? is just an Enumerable method, so if you want none?:
module Enumerable
def none?(&block)
!any?(&block)
end
end
If you do this, anything that includes Enumerable can use none?. I
don't think Sequel should add this method, as Sequel doesn't modify
the core classes/modules other than to support its DSL. However, the
beauty of ruby is you can add the method easily yourself.
Jeremy
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sequel-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
