On Jul 11, 12:52 pm, Clive Crous <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/7/11 Jeremy Evans <[email protected]>: > > > I'm not opposed to a patch that does that, assuming it came with > > decent specs. > > By "that" do you mean a patch that explicitly limited arguments to a > single hash or something a lot more generic like *args?
I was thinking *args. If we are going to add additional flexibility in this area, there's no reason to restrict it to a single hash. Jeremy --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
