On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy Evans<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 13, 3:00 pm, Scott LaBounty <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Jeremy,
>>
>> Thanks, that did it.
>>
>> OK, if I haven't tried your patience too much yet ... While I was trying to
>> get this working, I realized that Ramaze itself has a paginate type function
>> (looks like it may have been modeled on Sequel). Is there a reason to use
>> one over the other? The Ramaze one works on arrays, so I'm doing something
>> like @books = paginate(Book.select.order(:title).all). This seems to work
>> fine for what I'm doing, but I don't always know all the facts.
>
> The Ramaze pagination feature is generic, and probably should not be
> used in production environments with large datasets.  Because it
> requires an array, you would need to select all records from the
> dataset instead of only the records you need to display that page.

The Ramaze paginate does actually use the sequel paginate method if
possible, but can also handle arrays.
Github is down right now, so I can't point to the exact location, but
if you do something like:

@books = paginate(Book.select.order(:title)), it will call
Book.select.order(:title).paginate and work with that.
The Array handling was added after this functionality to provide a
common interface to data that is in memory already.
Seems like I have to update the documentation to make this clear.

-- 
^ manveru

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sequel-talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to