El Lunes, 28 de Diciembre de 2009, Jeremy Evans escribió: > If you are using the single threaded pool, it's the behavior I would > expect looking at the current code. I think it's a bug, as the > SingleThreadedPool should operate the same as the standard > ConnectionPool if used in single threaded code.
Yes, I'm using single_threaded. I'll send afull backtrace. Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
