On Mar 9, 11:36 pm, John Firebaugh <[email protected]> wrote: > The fact that one_to_one associations are a thin layer on one_to_many, > specifically the need for them to be named in the plural, is causing a fair > bit of accidental complexity in a custom plugin we have that does heavy > reflection on associations. > > What would be necessary to be able to name one_to_one associations in the > singular?
I'm not sure of all the changes that would be needed to make it work. It's possible that the changes are extensive enough to require the creation of a real one_to_one association. That being said, it would be helpful for you to explain what the actual issues you are running into are. It's possible that we just need to add something to the association reflection classes to eliminate or at least reduce the complexity. Jeremy -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sequel-talk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sequel-talk?hl=en.
